Chicago Sun-Times

2nd scooter pilot better than 1st, though rate of ridership down

- BY FRAN SPIELMAN, CITY HALL REPORTER fspielman@suntimes.com | @fspielman

One month into Chicago’s second grand experiment with electric scooters, a few things have changed that shows the excitement may be wearing off.

The ridership rate is down, despite an increase in trips. So far this year, there have been 230,400 trips. That compares with 218,000 trips during the first month of last year’s pilot, but that was in a smaller area and with fewer scooters.

Only three companies were selected for this round: Bird, Lime and Spin.

The average number of trips-per-scooter is 1.42 daily trips for each device, down from 4.76 daily trips during the same period a year ago.

Scooter trips this year average 1.87 miles; that’s 34% longer than the average ride during the first pilot.

Complaints about scooters to Chicago’s 311 system have dropped dramatical­ly — by 60% — thanks to a new requiremen­t that riders lock their scooters to a fixed object at the end of their trips. Approved locking locations include bike racks, corrals, street signs, retired parking meters and light poles. Bus stop signs are a no-no.

And the city’s three vendors are doing a much better job of meeting a city mandate that 50% of scooters be deployed to a “priority area” that includes huge swaths of the South and West sides.

Through the first month of Round 2, a daily average of 49.3% of all scooters have been deployed to the “priority area,” more than double last year’s compliance rate of 28%. Nearly 27% of all scooter trips occurred in the priority area.

Business Affairs and Consumer Protection Commission­er Rosa Escareno said she is encouraged but remains determined to hold the three vendors to the city’s “strict terms and requiremen­ts.”

Already, the department has issued 14 “notices to correct,” including six apiece for Bird and Lime and two for Spin.

Transporta­tion Commission­er Gia Biagi said she is “encouraged” by the statistics and by “anecdotal reports from residents, advocates and city staff.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States