Chicago Sun-Times

WITH LIGHTHOUSE IN LIMBO, FEDS SAY THEY WANT IT BACK

City has been unable to do anything with deteriorat­ing structure during decade of ownership

- BY MITCH DUDEK, STAFF REPORTER mdudek@suntimes.com | @mitchdudek

The federal government is clutching its pearls at how the city has taken care of the Chicago Harbor Lighthouse since it transferre­d ownership of the aging icon more than a decade ago — and now they want it back.

In particular, they scoffed at the idea of turning the lighthouse into a luxury hotel with a helicopter pad; two Chicago developers floated that concept, but it stalled then died in the spitballin­g phase after both concluded it’d be too tough to turn a profit.

The city has owned the lighthouse since the Coast Guard, National Park Service and General Services Administra­tion signed off on handing over the deed in 2009 under an agreement the city would figure out a way to restore the deteriorat­ing building for public use and education.

Similar arrangemen­ts have been made for other lighthouse­s around the country since the National Historic Lighthouse Preservati­on Act of 2000 provided the blueprint.

The city initially hinted at the possibilit­y of turning the lighthouse into a museum with a cafe. The idea of a bed and breakfast was kicked around. A ready supply of curiosity seekers could be ferried over from nearby Navy Pier, the thinking went.

City planners were open to other ideas and tried to match the lighthouse with a suitor whose repurposin­g plans fall within preservati­on requiremen­ts.

The Sun-Times learned about the luxury hotel idea through an open records request and published a story in December detailing how it was one of several ideas that surfaced in the last few years on how to breathe life back into the building.

The story was the focal point of several emails the National Park Service sent in June to the city’s Department of Planning and Developmen­t; those emails also were obtained through an open records request.

Referring to the Sun-Times story, NPS employee Alesha Cerny wrote the General Services Administra­tion “is hounding me on this and we’ve got to get this figured out. ... The article includes an architectu­ral rendering of a possible hotel and restaurant at the

[lighthouse] that is completely inappropri­ate and presents a treatment that is not in compliance with the terms” of the National Historic Lighthouse Preservati­on Act.

“While this may have not been a serious contender, it is very problemati­c that such an idea was even printed,” Cerny wrote.

The lighthouse was not being cared for as promised and efforts to preserve and repurpose the building “should have been well underway,” Cerny added.

“But instead it sits without anything being

done to it and it continues to deteriorat­e so GSA would like it reverted back to them. Is the city still trying to seek out new partners or potential new stewarts (sic) for the light or would they like to give it up?” she wrote.

Kathleen E. Dickhut, deputy commission­er with the city’s Department of Planning and Developmen­t, emailed Cerny back, writing she had checked with the planning department and Navy Pier, “and although it is an intriguing building, neither organizati­on has been able to find a suitable user after years of exploring the issue. Please let me know the process of returning the property” to the Park Service.

Arrangemen­ts have yet to be hammered out.

“The federal government is presently scheduling a time to discuss this process with the city,” GSA spokeswoma­n Cat Langel said in an email.

No decisions have been finalized on the fate of the building’s ownership, according to Langel and city spokesman Peter Strazzabos­co.

In explaining the city’s lack of progress, Strazzabos­co cited “challenges involving the site’s location, seasonal usage limitation­s, lack of docking facilities, unknown market demand and other issues.”

If the federal government retakes possession, the lighthouse could be offered for free to non-profit organizati­ons. If no one bites, then it could be auctioned with preservati­on requiremen­ts outlined in the deed, Langel said.

The most the feds have ever gotten at a lighthouse auction was $933,888, when the Graves Light Station on the outskirts of the Boston Harbor sold to a local man in 2013 who undertook restoratio­n.

Don Terras, an authority on lighthouse­s who maintains Evanston’s Grosse Pointe Lighthouse, said auctioning the lighthouse would be an option of last resort.

“It’s a last ditch effort, but this might be a last ditch effort situation,” he said.

The lighthouse was built in 1893 and reconstruc­ted at its current location — about a mile offshore of downtown — in 1917.

It’s been all but abandoned for decades. It still functions. But it’s been fully automated, no longer needing a lighthouse keeper, since the 1970s.

Terras would love to see the building restored, but he also recognizes the enormous hurdles.

“The city is in the middle of battling a pandemic ...” Terras said.

“I think if the feds take it back, they’ll probably sit on it for a while, ’til things settle down after the election and then maybe a wealthy citizen with an eye toward preservati­on will step up and hammer out a plan,” he said.

Whatever happens, one thing is certain: Every year, the weather chips away at the lighthouse.

“With the freeze-thaw process, there will eventually be no other alternativ­e than to take the thing down, and that would be a huge loss,” he said.

It has no dock, heat, plumbing or running water, and electricit­y is limited.

But the bones seemed to be in decent shape, according to a city- commission­ed assessment completed in 2015.

Estimates on the cost to make the building safe for visitors were included in the report but redacted in a copy released by city officials.

“I’ve been all around the country, and I can’t think of any lighthouse that has such a magnificen­t urban vista,” Terras said.

 ?? MITCH DUDEK/SUN-TIMES ?? The Chicago Harbor Lighthouse, located a mile out on Lake Michigan.
MITCH DUDEK/SUN-TIMES The Chicago Harbor Lighthouse, located a mile out on Lake Michigan.
 ?? CHICAGO HARBOR LIGHTHOUSE ASSESSMENT REPORT ?? LEFT: The lantern and foghorn are still on duty at the lighthouse, and any potential redevelopm­ent of the site would have to take that into account.
CHICAGO HARBOR LIGHTHOUSE ASSESSMENT REPORT LEFT: The lantern and foghorn are still on duty at the lighthouse, and any potential redevelopm­ent of the site would have to take that into account.
 ?? PROVIDED BY DAVID MORTON ?? ABOVE: An architectu­ral rendering of what would have been a hotel and restaurant at the Chicago Harbor Lighthouse.
PROVIDED BY DAVID MORTON ABOVE: An architectu­ral rendering of what would have been a hotel and restaurant at the Chicago Harbor Lighthouse.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States