Chicago Sun-Times

JUSTICES SIGNAL THEY’LL OK NEW ABORTION LIMITS, MAY TOSS ROE

- BY MARK SHERMAN AND JESSICA GRESKO

WASHINGTON — In the biggest challenge to abortion rights in decades, the Supreme Court’s conservati­ve majority on Wednesday signaled they would allow states to ban abortion much earlier in pregnancy and may even overturn the nationwide right that has existed for nearly 50 years.

With hundreds of demonstrat­ors outside chanting for and against, the justices led arguments that could decide the fate of the court’s historic 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion throughout the United States and its 1992 ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirmed Roe.

The outcome probably won’t be known until next June. But after nearly two hours of arguments, all six conservati­ve justices, including three appointed by former President Donald Trump, indicated they would uphold a Mississipp­i law that bans abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

At the very least, such a decision would undermine Roe and Casey, which allow states to regulate but not ban abortion up until the point of fetal viability, at roughly 24 weeks.

And there was also substantia­l support among the conservati­ve justices for getting rid of Roe and Casey altogether. Justice Clarence Thomas is the only member of the court who has openly called for overruling the two cases.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, asked whether the court would be better off withdrawin­g completely from the abortion issue and letting states decide.

“Why should this court be the arbiter rather than Congress, the state legislatur­es, state supreme courts, the people being able to resolve this?” Kavanaugh asked. “And there will be different answers in Mississipp­i and New York, different answers in Alabama than California.”

Abortion would soon become illegal or severely restricted in roughly half the states if Roe and Casey are overturned, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organizati­on that supports abortion rights. Legislatur­es in many Republican-led states are poised for action depending on the Supreme Court’s ruling.

The court’s three liberal justices said that reversing Roe and Casey would significan­tly damage the court’s own legitimacy.

“Will this institutio­n survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constituti­on and its reading are just political acts?” Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked.

In unusually strong terms for a high-court argument, Justice Stephen Breyer warned his colleagues they “better be damn sure” before they throw away the establishe­d abortion decisions.

Public opinion polls show support for preserving Roe, though some surveys also find backing for greater restrictio­ns on abortion.

Among the conservati­ves, Chief Justice John Roberts appeared most interested in a less sweeping ruling that would uphold the Mississipp­i law but not explicitly overrule Roe and Casey.

“That may be what they’re asking for, but the thing at issue before us today is 15 weeks,” Roberts said, alluding to Mississipp­i’s call to overturn the broader cases in addition to upholding its own law.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States