Chicago Sun-Times

Kraft, Mondelez agree to $16M penalty over wheat trading

- BY DAVID ROEDER, BUSINESS & LABOR REPORTER droeder@suntimes.com | @RoederDavi­d

Chicago-based food companies Kraft Heinz and Mondelez Internatio­nal have agreed to jointly pay $16 million to settle long-pending charges that they manipulate­d wheat prices to their advantage in 2011.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the federal regulator of the agricultur­al futures market, first filed the charges in 2015. The agency said the companies, which in 2011 were together under the Kraft name, made a $5.4 million profit on illegal trading.

The settlement was approved last week by U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey. It includes no admission of wrongdoing.

The $16 million penalty was first agreed to in 2019, but the case became complicate­d when two commission­ers of the CFTC issued comments about it in a news release. The companies charged that the comments violated an agreement that all parties would remain silent about the case.

Blakey criticized the CFTC’s conduct and wanted to subpoena the two commission­ers, Dan Berkovitz and Rostin Behnam. In 2019, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the commission­ers were free to comment on a case. Behnam is now chairman of the five-member CFTC and Berkovitz is no longer a commission­er.

The settlement said Mondelez must pay the penalty but that both companies are liable. It’s not known if Kraft and Mondelez have their own agreement to share the cost. Neither company responded to a request for comment.

The CFTC alleged the former Kraft devised a strategy in the late summer 2011 to counteract high prices for cash wheat. It said the company purchased 3,000 futures contracts expiring in December 2011, costing about $90 million, sending the market a false signal that it would use the wheat when in fact it was far more than it needed.

The CFTC said the real aim was to profit from trading in futures expiring later than December 2011 and to drive down the price of cash wheat to meet real needs. It also said the company exceeded speculativ­e position limits establishe­d by the Chicago Board of Trade.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States