Chicago Sun-Times

Illinois is leading the way to finalize the Equal Rights Amendment

- BY MICHELE H. THORNE Michele H. Thorne is a Chicago attorney, legal scholar and ERA advocate. The views and opinions expressed by contributo­rs are their own and do not necessaril­y reflect those of the Chicago Sun-Times or any of its affiliates.

There is good news, bad news and great news on the Equal Rights Amendment, an amendment to the U.S. Constituti­on that prohibits sex discrimina­tion.

The good news: The ERA is already our 28th Amendment.

Our Constituti­on sets forth a two-step amending process. First, proposal of an amendment by two-thirds of each house of Congress, which for the ERA happened in 1972. Second, ratificati­on of the proposed amendment by three-fourths of the states, which is 38 states of 50. In 2020, following the 2018 ratificati­on by Illinois, Virginia became the last necessary state to ratify the ERA. We supporters of the ERA did it.

The bad news: The White House has not yet recognized the ERA as our 28th Amendment. That step entails publicatio­n of the amendment by the U.S. archivist, as part of his ministeria­l duties.

The two excuses are based on legal questions. First, the supposed “deadline” of seven to 10 years for states to ratify the ERA; the ratificati­on took 48 years, however. Second, there have been attempts by a few states to rescind their ratificati­ons.

But the “deadline” is without basis in the Constituti­on, which neither imposes a deadline nor grants Congress authority to impose a deadline. To have an effect, any deadline would have to be within the text of an amendment, where it is approved by both Congress and the states. The so-called “ERA deadline” was only in an internal congressio­nal resolution. The states didn’t vote on it; only Congress did so.

Further, the 27th Amendment took over 200 years to ratify. The purported ERA deadline is invalid, unenforcea­ble and hypocritic­al.

As for states rescinding their ratificati­on, such rescission­s are without basis in the Constituti­on, which only counts ratificati­ons. Throughout history and in our official records, there have never been subtractio­ns of ratificati­on based on states’ attempts to rescind. As political winds change, states cannot undo their ratificati­on. Ratificati­on is a one-way process that is irrevocabl­e.

The failure of the Biden administra­tion to recognize the amendment does not impact its legal validity, but it does have serious consequenc­es. The Biden administra­tion has neither published nor enforced the ERA. Congress has not passed laws to implement the ERA nor has it updated existing laws. The judiciary branch has ignored the amendment when rendering legal decisions. State and local government­s have not updated their laws or justice systems to take the amendment into account. And we the people have not been informed that the ERA is in force.

This failure to uphold the ERA is an egregious violation of the Constituti­on, which requires officials to follow the law.

The great news: Illinois is taking action. Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul sued to force publicatio­n of the ERA. In opposition, President Joe Biden’s administra­tion has fought publicatio­n. This is a case of states’ rights to have their constituti­onal ratificati­ons honored vs. the power of the national government to infringe and blatantly disregard states’ rights. However, because the states’ right to relief must meet a very high standard of being “clear and indisputab­le,” on Feb. 28, an appeals court chose not to compel publicatio­n.

Our Illinois congressio­nal delegation strongly supports the ERA. Rep. Danny Davis wears an ERA YES pin, and Reps. Jan Schakowsky and Lauren Underwood are vocal advocates. Sen. Dick Durbin chaired a judiciary hearing on a bipartisan joint resolution, S.J.Res.4, which affirms that the ERA is our 28th Amendment. Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton testified in favor.

While Senate action is unnecessar­y and procedural­ly unlikely, the majority’s message to affirm the amendment is thunderous.

The question is whether senators will falsely assert an extra-constituti­onal power to impose a deadline on amendments — or whether they will respect the Constituti­on’s plain text and original intent.

In our Illinois statehouse, Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz has introduced HJR0020, affirming the ERA as our 28th Amendment.

Many Illinois organizati­ons and individual­s are also national leaders advocating for the amendment’s official recognitio­n.

Thank you, Illinois, for leading the way on the ERA.

 ?? DREW ANGERER/GETTY IMAGES ?? From left, Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., shows artwork to Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., at a news conference to announce a joint resolution to affirm the ratificati­on of the Equal Rights Amendment on Capitol Hill on Jan. 31.
DREW ANGERER/GETTY IMAGES From left, Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., shows artwork to Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., at a news conference to announce a joint resolution to affirm the ratificati­on of the Equal Rights Amendment on Capitol Hill on Jan. 31.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States