Chicago Sun-Times

FROM HANDSHAKES TO HAND GRENADES

After playing it safe in 1st mayoral runoff debate, Vallas lobs his own verbal bombs in livelier 2nd go-round vs. Johnson

- BY FRAN SPIELMAN, CITY HALL REPORTER fspielman@suntimes.com | @fspielman

Paul Vallas came out of his technocrat­ic shell and fired back at Brandon Johnson Thursday in a spirited debate that put Johnson on the spot for his past support for the idea of defunding police and his current plan to raise $800 million in taxes to “invest in people.”

During their first televised debate last week, Johnson was the undisputed aggressor.

He accused Vallas of fronting for “rightwing extremists” and of setting the stage for an avalanche of property tax increases with the “accounting gimmicks” and pension fund raids Johnson accused Vallas of engineerin­g as CEO of the Chicago Public Schools.

That night, Vallas played it safe by trying to remain above the fray. His primary response to Johnson’s broadside was to call those criticisms “nonsense.”

On Thursday, it was a dramatical­ly different Vallas who showed up to debate his runoff opponent at ABC7 Chicago.

With the race tightening, even in his campaign’s own internal polls, Vallas brought the verbal equivalent of his boxing gloves to battle.

Answering the first question of the night, Vallas threw a verbal punch about Johnson’s history of talking favorably about the political goal of defunding the police.

Johnson is not saying it anymore. But, he still won’t commit to fully funding the Chicago Police Department’s $1.94 billion budget. In fact, he’s vowed to cut the CPD budget by at least $150 million, in part, by reducing the number of supervisor­s.

“My opponent wants to defund the police. He doesn’t want to fill the 1,100 vacancies. He does not want to bring back retired officers or invite other officers who have left to return without any loss of seniority,” Vallas said.

‘Smart policing’ or defunding police?

Johnson countered, “I’m not gonna defund the police. Never said it.”

Instead, the Cook County commission­er highlighte­d his plan for “smart policing,” which includes promoting 200 detectives to solve violent crime and freeing police officers from the burden of responding to the 40% of 911 calls for mental health and other nonpolice emergencie­s.

“We’re asking police officers to not only do their job, but someone else’s. They’re not social workers. They’re not counselors [or] marriage therapists. I’ve served on the front lines as a public school teacher in the city of Chicago. I’ve seen firsthand what that trauma entails,” Johnson said.

“We have to free up law enforcemen­t to focus on the more violent offenses. But, we also have to have someone as a police superinten

dent that recognizes that you can’t have supervisor­s who supervise the supervisor­s. Most police officers do not know who they’re reporting to day in and day out.” Vallas stood his ground.

“Smart policing is not defunding the police. Smart policing is not [not] filling the 1,100 vacancies. Smart policing is not promoting 200 detectives thinking that’s gonna solve the problem . ... Smart policing is filling the vacancies and pushing the police officers down to local beats, so they can respond in minutes to a 911 call,” Vallas said.

Businesses, budgets and billionair­es

Vallas also took aim at the cornerston­e of Johnson’s anti-violence strategy: $800 million in tax increases to help bankroll $1 billion worth of “investment­s in people.”

“You’re not gonna promote businesses by re-imposing the head tax, which taxes small businesses. That is not a tax-therich tax. You’re not gonna help businesses in general by increasing the hotel-motel tax by 66%, which, of course, is part of my opponent’s $800 million tax plan. Hotels and motels are already paying the highest taxes in the country and they have barely survived, if they’ve come close to recovering from COVID,” Vallas said.

Johnson said $1 billion in social service investment­s is “what it takes for a better, stronger city.” He argued that his tax plan is based on a “fundamenta­l Democratic principle.”

“Democrats all over the country believe that the wealthy in this city and this country have to put more skin in the game and pay their fair share of taxes. President Biden said that a teacher and a firefighte­r should not pay the same tax rate as a billionair­e,” Johnson said.

“The reason why Paul Vallas is avoiding this dynamic is because he is supported by billionair­es. The way we get out of this structural deficit is by doing what works: Eliminatin­g the deficit that he caused. Create up to $1 billion in new investment­s. And do it without raising property taxes.”

Vallas didn’t take that attack lying down, either.

“Oh, my God. I haven’t been budget director in 20 years. I’m surprised he’s not criticizin­g me for being behind the grassy knoll in Dallas,” Vallas said, referring to the 1963 assassinat­ion of President John F. Kennedy.

After Johnson criticized Vallas’ handling of school budgets in jobs around the country, Vallas responded, “I’m debating with someone who has never managed a budget . ... So please don’t lecture me on managing budgets.”

Johnson fired back: “Here’s what I know about budgets: Paul’s not good at it.”

 ?? TYLER PASCIAK LARIVIERE/SUN-TIMES ?? Brandon Johnson and Paul Vallas shake hands before their debate Thursday at the ABC7 studio.
TYLER PASCIAK LARIVIERE/SUN-TIMES Brandon Johnson and Paul Vallas shake hands before their debate Thursday at the ABC7 studio.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States