Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Sorry, Megyn Kelly, free speech isn’t quite that free

- Clarence Page Clarence Page, a member of the Tribune Editorial Board, blogs at www .chicagotri­bune.com/pagespage. cpage@chicagotri­bune.com Twitter @cptime

When will they ever learn? Megyn Kelly is by no means the first white person to get into trouble over blackface imitations of black people. But she’s the first I can recall who may be punished not for doing it but just for talking about it.

NBC confirmed Friday morning that Kelly was negotiatin­g her exit from the network. She went on hiatus from “Megyn Kelly Today” on Thursday after a Tuesday program in which she defended the practice of wearing burnt-cork or other dark makeup in Halloween costumes.

“Back when I was a kid, that was OK, as long as you were dressing up as, like, a character,” she said in that segment. She then defended Luann de Lesseps of “The Real Housewives of New York,” who ignited a controvers­y by turning her skin darker for a tribute to Diana Ross.

“I thought, like, who doesn’t love Diana Ross?” said Kelly. “She wants to look like Diana Ross for one day, and I don’t know how that got racist on Halloween.”

My free-speech side wants to see Kelly’s point. In these hypersensi­tive times, I think we should avoid becoming too punitive about people who accidental­ly offend out of ignorance, not apparent malice. Ideally we should be able to use such social gaffes to learn what matters and what doesn’t in our group interactio­ns.

But I also believe that, whether we are the offender or the offended, we should be willing to learn from the experience­s and attitudes of others and avoid committing such gaffes again. Kelly came to NBC from Fox News, where she already had a history of odd racial gaffes involving holidays, among other topics.

For example, in a December 2013 discussion on her old Fox News show about the appropriat­eness of nonwhites playing Santa Claus, she said, “by the way, for all you kids watching at home, Santa just is white … Santa is what he is.”

Or isn’t. Kelly later apologized for that and for stating just as questionab­ly during the discussion that Jesus was white too.

Neither of those remarks was fatal to her career at a news channel that, by the way, has made “war on Christmas” and crusades about the incorrectn­ess of “political correctnes­s” part of its brand.

But NBC was a different story. Like another highly paid star, Roseanne Barr, who was fired by ABC over a racist tweet, Kelly found her colleagues at NBC, especially her prominent African-American colleagues, to be less tolerant of such gaffes. NBC staff members as Al Roker and newsman Craig Melvin denounced Kelly’s comments as indefensib­ly insensitiv­e.

This is where I have a hard time. As an African-American parent, I feel as Roker does — that blackface makeup intentiona­lly or unintentio­nally revives the minstrel show, a relic of the segregated Jim Crow era in which white entertaine­rs such as Al Jolson or black entertaine­rs such as vaudeville star Bert Williams put on blackface to imitate black performers for white audiences.

Ignorance in this Megyn Kelly instance is not much of an excuse. A search through my own archives confirms that I, for one, have been commenting on blackface controvers­ies since at least the late-1980s. That was when members of Zeta Beta Tau at the University of Wisconsin offended black students by holding a mock slave auction, in which some pledges wore blackface. The chapter was ordered to attend a race relations workshop and perform volunteer work in a black community.

In the years since I have seen blackface controvers­ies break out over “cultural appropriat­ion,” among other labels, for students who dress up as stereotypi­cal versions of ethnic or racial groups to which they do not belong. I am skeptical of some cultural appropriat­ion complaints.

Where would popular music be, for example, without the borrowing, “sampling” and other innovation­s that blend this country’s rich mulligan stew of cultural diversity into something greater?

What’s important for the future is our ability to keep our melting pot from boiling over with confusion and resentment­s. As a first step, none of us should presume we know so much about our fellow Americans that we don’t need to bother with asking them how they really feel.

 ?? JOHN LAMPARSKI/WIREIMAGE ??
JOHN LAMPARSKI/WIREIMAGE
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States