Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING

-

It’s no surprise that victims’ rights activists and their allies are furious about the U.S. Education Department’s proposed changes to Title IX, the federal statute that deals with sex and gender discrimina­tion on campus. It is surprising, however, to see the American Civil Liberties Union joining in this chorus. The ACLU has long defended the rights of accused terrorists, criminals, neo-Nazis, and the Westboro Baptist Church. The group works tirelessly to protect due process, even for the least sympatheti­c among us.

Yet the ACLU has condemned the new Title IX rules, declaring on Twitter: “The proposed rule would make schools less safe for survivors of sexual assault and harassment, when there is already alarmingly high rates of campus sexual assaults and harassment that go unreported. It promotes an unfair process, inappropri­ately favoring the accused and letting schools ignore their responsibi­lity under Title IX to respond promptly and fairly to complaints of sexual violence.”

I am astonished to see the ACLU take the position that a government policy gives an accused person too many rights, especially when these rights are things the ACLU has generally supported. In other words, they are not weird new rights invented out of thin air. These are standard protection­s that regrettabl­y were not applied to campus sexual misconduct adjudicati­on during the Obama years. The Title IX reforms ... greatly strengthen due process protection­s for students accused of sexual misconduct, and they relieve colleges of the burden of investigat­ing suggestive speech that should be permissibl­e on free speech grounds.

Robby Soave, Reason

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States