Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Religious freedom trackers face a rift with Congress

Bill sparks debate on whether group can stay bipartisan

- By Elana Schor

WASHINGTON — The federal commission that tracks global religious freedom is facing a rift with Capitol Hill over a proposal that some members warn would hurt its effectiven­ess.

At issue is bipartisan legislatio­n introduced two months ago to reauthoriz­e the U.S. Commission on Internatio­nal Religious Freedom for four years. The bill also would ask the commission to review “the abuse of religion to justify human rights violations” — a responsibi­lity not defined in more detail — and restrict commission­ers from using their federal title when they speak as private citizens. Additional­ly, commission­ers would have to report to Congress on internatio­nal travel paid for by sources outside their families or the government.

In a capital often dominated by partisan polarizati­on, those proposed changes created a rare division: senators in both parties seeking increased oversight, and commission­ers in both parties balking.

The bipartisan commission, establishe­d in 1998 by Congress, has used its megaphone to amplify hotbutton religious freedom issues worldwide, ranging from the detainment of an American pastor in Turkey to inflammato­ry content in Saudi textbooks. But the presence of three prominent conservati­ve evangelica­ls on the commission at a time when President Donald Trump is elevating religious freedom is sparking debate about whether it can stay above the political fray.

The tension seeped into public view recently when one GOP-appointed commission­er, Kristina Arriaga, resigned from her post with a warning against the legislatio­n released by GOP and Democratic senators.

Arriaga opposes the proposed new oversight requiremen­ts for commission­ers, writing to The Associated Press that the bill would turn a unified commission into a “useless bureaucrac­y.” But she also sees problems in Congress asking the commission to vet human rights infringeme­nt, predicting that it could mire their portfolio in same-sex marriage, circumcisi­on and other politicall­y volatile religious topics.

“Expanding the mission to include the possibilit­y of discussing religious practices as human rights violations sounds innocuous,” Arriaga said in an interview, “but it opens up a whole theologica­l discussion about what happens inside of religions.”

A leading Republican working on a bipartisan agreement to reauthoriz­e the commission, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, tweeted Friday in response to a Wall Street Journal op-ed Arriaga published that the proposed changes she decried were part of the process of legislativ­e compromise.

In fact, some of the changes Arriaga opposes were aimed at ensuring commission­ers — who serve as unpaid volunteers — don’t misreprese­nt the religious freedom body while speaking as private individual­s. One commission­er, Trump evangelica­l adviser Johnnie Moore, has met twice in the past year with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whose kingdom’s long-standing restraint of religious freedom has drawn criticism from the commission.

The Senate proposal “may have been well-intended, but it will have unintended consequenc­es,” Moore said in an interview.

Moore added that he personally pays for internatio­nal travel he takes to advocate for global religious freedom and interfaith collaborat­ion.

“What is clear is that religious freedom is becoming more of a partisan issue, and it used to be an entirely bipartisan issue,” Moore said. “I think that’s the biggest loss in this.”

The Senate proposal reauthoriz­ing the commission was set for considerat­ion at a Foreign Relations Committee meeting in September

but got postponed amid the pushback.

The committee’s top Democrat, New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez, questioned at that time whether commission­ers critical of the proposed new oversight requiremen­ts might be “part of the problem,” according to the transcript of the meeting. Menendez also said that the commission already tackles human rights issues, questionin­g why the addition of that responsibi­lity would be contentiou­s.

The commission is expected to keep operating on a short-term basis while talks continue about a longer-term agreement. Eight commission­ers from both parties, all except Arriaga, sent an Oct. 22 letter to Rubio that acknowledg­ed the value of tackling “issues identified in the past headon” while raising “concerns” with the Senate bill as introduced.

Concerns among some religious freedom commission­ers about the bill’s expanded human rights responsibi­lities are not entirely limited to its conservati­ves, who include two other Trump evangelica­l advisers: Tony Perkins, president of the right-leaning Family Research Council, and Gary Bauer, president of the right-leaning group American Values.

 ?? MARK J. TERRILL/AP ?? The U.S. Commission on Internatio­nal Religious Freedom, chaired by Tony Perkins, warns that the changes outlined in the congressio­nal proposal would hurt its effectiven­ess.
MARK J. TERRILL/AP The U.S. Commission on Internatio­nal Religious Freedom, chaired by Tony Perkins, warns that the changes outlined in the congressio­nal proposal would hurt its effectiven­ess.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States