Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Russia’s vaccine rollout draws wary response

- By Daria Litvinova

MOSCOW — While excitement and enthusiasm greeted the Western-developed coronaviru­s vaccine when it was rolled out, the Russian-made version has received a mixed response, with reports of empty Moscow clinics that offered the shot to health careworker­s and teachers — the first members of the public designated to receive it.

Kremlin officials and state- controlled media touted the Sputnik V vaccine as amajor achievemen­t after itwas approved Aug. 11. But among Russians, hope that the shot would reverse the course of the COVID-19 crisis has become mixed with wariness and skepticism, reflecting concerns about how it was rushed out while still in its late-stage testing to ensure its effectiven­ess and safety.

Russia faced internatio­nal criticism for approving a vaccine that hasn’t completed advanced trials among tens of thousands of people, and experts both at home and abroad warned against its wider use until the studies are completed.

Despite those warnings, authoritie­s started offering it to certain high-risk groups, such as front-line medical workers, within weeks of approval. Alexander Gintsburg, head of the Gamaleya Institute that developed the vaccine, said last week over 150,000 Russians have gotten it.

One recipient was Dr. Alexander Z at se pin, an ICU specialist in Voronezh, a city 310 miles south of Moscow, who received the vaccine in October.

“We’ve been working with COVID-19 patients since March, and every day when we come home, we worry about infecting our family members. So when some kind of opportunit­y to protect them and myself appeared, I thought it should be used,” he said.

But Zatsepin said he still takes precaution­s against infection because studies of the vaccine’s effectiven­ess aren’t over.

“There is no absolute confidence yet,” he said.

Russia approved its vaccine after it was tested on only a few dozen people, touting it as “the first in the world” to receive ago-ahead. Developers named it “Sputnik V,” a reference to the Soviet Union’s 1957 launch of the world’s first satellite during the Cold War.

More than just national pride is at stake.

Russia has recorded more than 2.7 million cases of COVID-19, and over 49,000 deaths, and it wants to avoid another damaging lockdown of its economy.

On Dec. 2, Putin cited a target of over 2 million doses in the coming days. Despite such a limited supply for a nation of 146 million, Moscow immediatel­y widened who was

eligible for it. Shots are free to everyone in medical or educationa­l facilities, both state and private; social and municipal workers; retail and service workers; and those in the arts.

The European Medicines Agency said it has not received a request fromthe vaccine makers to consider licensing it for use in the EU, but some data have been shared with the World Health Organizati­on. The U.N. agency does not typically approve vaccines itself but waits for regulatory agencies to weigh in first. The Russian vaccine is reportedly under considerat­ion for use in a global effort led by WHO to distribute COVID-19 vaccines to poorer countries.

Unlike in the U.K., where the first shots are going to the elderly, Sputnik V is going to those 18 to 60 who don’t have chronic illnesses and aren’t pregnant or breastfeed­ing.

Putin himself hasn’t gotten a Russian-made shot yet.

Its developers have said study data suggest the vaccine was 91% effective, a conclusion based on 78 infections among nearly 23,000 participan­ts. That’s far fewer cases than Western drugmakers have accumulate­d during final testing before analyzing their candidates’ efficacy, and important demographi­c and other details from the study have not been released.

Some experts say such efficacy rates inspire optimism, but public trust may be an issue.

“I don’t so much worry about Sputnik V being unsafe or less effective than we need it to be,” said Judy Twigg, a political science professor at Virginia Commonweal­th University specializi­ng in global health. “I worry about whether or not people are going to be willing to take it in Russia.”

Apoll conducted in October by the Levada Center, Russia’s top independen­t pollster, showed that 59% of Russians were unwilling to get the shots even if offered for free.

Dr. Y ekaterina K as ya nova of Siberia’s Kemerovo region said she didn’t trust it enough to get the shot and has advised her mother, a teacher, not to get it either, adding: “The vaccine is several months old. Longterm side effects are not known, its effectiven­ess hasn’t been proven.”

Dzhamilya Kryazheva, a teacher in Krasnogors­k near Moscow, echoed that sentiment.

“I don’t intend to experiment on my body. I have three children,” she said.

For other health care workers, the choice to be vaccinated was easy.

“People are dying here every day. Every day, we carry out corpses. What’s there to think about?” said

Dr. Marina Pecherkina, an infectious disease specialist in the Far East city of Vladivosto­k. She got her shots in October because of her daily work with coronaviru­s patients.

Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said around 15,000 people received the shots since vaccinatio­ns started Dec. 5. But some media reports about the first days of the Moscow campaign showed empty clinics and medical workers offering the shots to anyone who walked in. In some instances, this was because the vaccine must be stored at minus 0.4 degrees Fahrenheit, and each vial contains five doses. Once defrosted, it must be administer­ed within two hours or discarded.

The rollout outside Moscow and the surroundin­g region appeared to go much slower, with Health Minister Mikhail Murashko declaring that all regions started the vaccinatio­n Dec. 15.

Media reports suggested theremay be problems with scaling up the manufactur­e and distributi­on of Sputnik V. It uses two different adenovirus vectors for the two-shot regimen, which complicate­s production. In addition, the low-temperatur­e storage and transport makes it harder to move across the vast country.

Several medical workers in Siberia who received the vaccine later reported contractin­g the virus, but health officials said not enough time had passed for them to develop the antibodies.

Dr. Yevgenia Alexeyeva in the Siberian city of Tomsk tested positive for the virus 12 days after her second shot. Alexeyeva said she wasn’t surprised by the result and that it didn’t shake her confidence in the vaccine.

“The vaccine doesn’t guarantee that the person wouldn’t get infected. But it should protect us from developing a severe case,” Alexeyeva said.

 ?? PAVELGOLOV­KIN/AP ?? ARussianme­dicalworke­r finishes the procedure after administer­ing Russia’s SputnikVco­ronavirus vaccineDec. 10 in Moscow. Russia faced internatio­nal criticism for approving a vaccine that hasn’t completed advanced trials.
PAVELGOLOV­KIN/AP ARussianme­dicalworke­r finishes the procedure after administer­ing Russia’s SputnikVco­ronavirus vaccineDec. 10 in Moscow. Russia faced internatio­nal criticism for approving a vaccine that hasn’t completed advanced trials.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States