Honoring DuSable’s legacy

I commend the editorial in favor of keeping the name of Lake Shore Drive (“Saving Lake Shore Drive, honoring DuSable,” May 9). The road is a symbol of pride among our residents and a lush showpiece for tourists of this great, world-class city.

However, I’m still pondering whether it should be renamed after the city’s founder, Jean Baptiste Point DuSable. The editorial makes a good argument about other cities not renaming important roads. But let’s be clear: While there are Chicago sites named after DuSable, DuSable Park doesn’t honor this man at all. In fact, it’s an affront to his legacy.

The city has dragged its feet on developing the park long after it was cleared of contamination. Then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel beefed up the Riverwalk and Navy Pier but did little for DuSable Park. I have never read an editorial that criticized the city’s slow efforts on developing DuSable Park or urged the mayor to give it the priority given to other projects in high-profile areas. There’s not even a sign at the site informing the residents of its purpose.

DuSable Park is just a 3.4-acre patch of grass with the city’s new multimillion-dollar flyover to Navy Pier nearby.

I understand why supporters of the renaming feel that the city is shortchanging on its commitment to honor DuSable’s legacy. DuSable’s name and legacy should not be limited to just bits and pieces on buildings in lower-profile places.

It’s time to truly honor this man in a bigger and more respectable and fitting way that reflects his contributions. I’m not saying to rename Lake Shore Drive after him, but DuSable deserves better.

— Erick Johnson, Chicago