Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Biden facing a dilemma on infrastruc­ture

The choice may be between going green and going bipartisan

- By Lisa Mascaro and Matthew Daly

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden’s hopes of channeling billions of dollars into green infrastruc­ture investment­s to fight climate change are running into the political obstacle of winning over Republican lawmakers who oppose that approach as unnecessar­y, excessive spending.

As negotiatio­ns unfold in Congress in search of a bipartisan deal, the White House’s ability to ensure a climate focus in Biden’s sweeping infrastruc­ture package is becoming daunting — so much so that key Democrats are warning the administra­tion to quit negotiatin­g with Republican­s, calling it a waste of time that will produce no viable compromise.

“From my perspectiv­e, no climate, no deal,” said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass. “I won’t just vote

“The President has underscore­d that climate change is one of the defining crises we face as a nation, and he and his team have continuous­ly fought for leading on the clean energy economy and on clean energy jobs ... ” — White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates

against an infrastruc­ture package without climate action — I’ll fight against it.”

The debate is similar to the political and policy difference­s complicati­ng Biden’s broader talks over his ambitious infrastruc­ture agenda, the sweeping $1.7 trillion American Jobs Plan making its way through Congress, as Democrats and Republican­s argue over what, exactly, constitute­s infrastruc­ture and how much is needed.

The White House is holding firm to Biden’s initial ideas, which tally nearly $1 trillion in climate-related investment­s that aim to bolster the electric vehicle market, make buildings and property more resilient to harsh weather patterns and push the country’s electrical grid to become carbon-free by 2035.

The president is seeking a newer definition of infrastruc­ture, trying not only to patch up the nation’s roads and highways, but also to rebuild its economy with new kinds of investment­s for the 21st century. The Republican­s prefer a more traditiona­l approach that touches modestly on some climate-related elements but focuses more specifical­ly on transporta­tion and other typical developmen­ts.

As Biden courts a new bipartisan group of 10 senators, who are eyeing a scaled-down proposal, leading Democrats are worried their party is losing an opportunit­y with control of the House, Senate and White House to make gains on its climate change priorities.

“The President has underscore­d that climate change is one of the defining crises we face as a nation,” White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates said Friday, “and he and his team have continuous­ly fought for leading on the clean energy economy and on clean energy jobs — which is critical for our economic growth, competitiv­eness, and middle class.”

For all the divisions, there may be some common ground between the White House and the Republican­s, particular­ly with the GOP senators now engaged in bipartisan talks.

Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a lead GOP negotiator, said he brought up flood resiliency and energy provisions that would benefit his state during a call with Biden on Tuesday. He was also seen engaged in a lengthy and somewhat animated conversati­on with Biden on the tarmac last month when the president visited Louisiana.

Hailing from a state familiar with harsh weather, Cassidy supports a bipartisan bill to offer tax breaks to property owners that protect homes and businesses against natural disasters such as wildfires, hurricanes, floods and drought, and another to support projects that “capture” and store carbon dioxide produced by coalfired plants and other fossil fuels. Louisiana has several sites vying to become a national hub for carbon capture.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has been largely silent on the bipartisan effort, and other GOP leaders are cool to this latest negotiatio­n, doubtful their five Republican colleagues will find a compromise.

The White House and Republican­s remain far apart on key details, including the overall scope of the package and how to pay for it.

Biden wants to hike the corporate tax rate, from 21% to 28%, which Republican­s oppose as a red line they will not cross.

Instead, the emerging bipartisan proposal from the 10 senators is expected to include an increase in the federal gas tax, which consumers pay at the pump, by linking it to inflation. Biden rejects that approach because he refuses to raise taxes on anyone making less than $400,000 a year. The group also may tap unspent COVID-19 relief funds and go after unpaid income taxes.

Jamal Raad, executive director of Evergreen Action, an environmen­tal group, said after months of negotiatio­ns that “it’s clear there will never be 10 votes from the GOP caucus” for major investment­s like those proposed by the White House.

In the House, the Congressio­nal Progressiv­e Caucus’ Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., tweeted: “An infrastruc­ture bill that doesn’t prioritize the climate crisis will not pass the House. Period.”

And Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., a leading climate hawk, said he is “nervous” that Democrats may not be serious about addressing climate change in the infrastruc­ture bill.

 ?? SUSAN WALSH/AP ?? Vice President Kamala Harris tours clean energy laboratori­es at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee during a visit last month to promote President Joe Biden’s infrastruc­ture plan. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., is seen with Harris.
SUSAN WALSH/AP Vice President Kamala Harris tours clean energy laboratori­es at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee during a visit last month to promote President Joe Biden’s infrastruc­ture plan. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., is seen with Harris.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States