Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

With nothing to lose — or win— how do Hawks finish?

- Phil Thompson On the Blackhawks

Three games left. After falling to the host San Jose Sharks 4-1 on Saturday, the Chicago Blackhawk are left to play out the string.

Or perhaps it’s more akin to performing last rites.

The Hawks host two their final two games at the United Center — against the Philadelph­ia Flyers on Monday and Vegas Golden Knights on Wednesday — and wrap up the season on the road Friday against the Buffalo Sabres.

“These are the grinds that are not easy to grind out,” coach Derek King said before the game. “These are the ones that you’ve really got to dig deep to find a way to motivate yourself or just figure a way to win that puck battle, shorten that shift, do all the little things right. “And it’s a challenge for us.”

And afterward, it’s ready, set, rebuild. General manager Kyle Davidson got a big jump on his roster reconstruc­tion last month, trading Brandon Hagel in a deal that netted two first-round picks in 2023 and ‘24 and promising rookie forward Taylor Raddysh, who has four goals and four assists in 17 games with the Hawks.

The Hawks also are holding onto a couple of long shots at gaining a couple of first-round picks in the upcoming draft: a 7.5% chance at winning the lottery if they stay in the sixth slot or winning the second draw, which would mean they keep the top-two-protected pick instead of sending it to the Columbus Blue Jackets; or upgrading the Minnesota Wild’s second-rounder if the Wild reach the Western Conference Finals and ex-Hawks goalie Marc-André Fleury wins four games in the first two rounds.

The Hawks already were eliminated from the playoffs for the second straight season and fourth time in five years.

So other than improving or worsening their lottery fortunes by a percentage point, the Hawks have nothing to lose or gain by winning or losing the last four games.

But how they finish matters to the organizati­onal mindset.

The Hawks plan on losing, perhaps for several seasons, to build up the roster through high draft picks. But the culture that takes hold during what promises to be lean years either could nourish the rebuild or prove poisonous.

Small cracks in the foundation could become fissures.

This is not a cohesive roster as currently constructe­d.

The Hawks have a top-heavy side, made up of the last two Stanley Cup veterans in Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane and 40-goal scorer Alex DeBrincat. And you have a bottom half of either veterans who could be dispatched in the offseason or young skaters who just as easily could find themselves in Rockford next season.

The Hawks to a man have said the right things — that they haven’t checked out — but what they’ve shown on the ice recently suggests they could be in for a tug of war between developmen­t and indifferen­ce, which only stands to get worse if they know going in they’re not playoff-bound.

Toews called a recent eight-game winless streak “pretty embarrassi­ng,” and given his storied history he absolutely should feel that way.

DeBrincat’s recent comments indicate he hasn’t quite reconciled himself to what he’s likely in for in the future.

“I think we have a lot we can work on and build off of and obviously next year, with the rebuild, we might lose more games than we win but that’s obviously never the goal,” he said.

“If we come out hot or (start) doing well, there’s no point to rebuild after that, right?” No, that’s not right.

Davidson and CEO Danny Wirtz have made it clear that plugging in high-priced free agents hasn’t worked, and the Hawks don’t have the talent in the pipeline to properly support them anyway. The main way to build up a perpetual contender is by acquiring high draft picks and top-end prospects, and that comes at a cost: the sacrifice of veterans and wins.

So that begs the question: What can the Hawks possibly hope to gain from these last four games?

“Well, play for pride and respect,” King said. “We talked about today in the meeting. Should be a little embarrasse­d about what happened last game (a 4-1 loss to the Kings), only getting six chances (according to naturalsta­ttrick.com, the Hawks had only three high-danger chances).

“That’s not good enough. I don’t care how bad you are as a hockey team, you can get more than six chances in a game. They’ve got some pride on the line, they’ve got to earn that respect back, and it’s a good time to redeem themselves” against the Sharks.

At times, the Hawks show life but either are outmanned by more talented teams or undermined by youthful miscues, such as key mistakes by defensemen Alex Vlasic and Alec Regula that led to Sharks goals Saturday.

Other times, they look like a team that has given up the ghost — pick any second period at random — but King insists the team hasn’t checked out.

“Even if I thought it I would never say it,” he said. “They can’t check out. There’s no way these guys are checked out. They’re struggling to find a way to play better.

“Mentally, they’re fired, I would say, and it’s just draining right now.”

If it’s draining now, just imagine what it could be like for 82 games next season.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States