Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Democrats quiet about rescue plan

Candidates don’t like talking about former marquee legislatio­n

- By Jim Tankersley

DUNWOODY, Ga. — In the midst of a critical runoff campaign that would determine control of the Senate, the Rev. Raphael Warnock promised Georgia voters that, if elected, he would help President-elect Joe Biden send checks to people digging out of the pandemic recession.

Warnock won. Democrats delivered payments of up to $1,400 per person.

But this year, as Warnock is locked in a tight reelection campaign, he barely talks about those checks.

Democratic candidates in competitiv­e Senate races this fall have spent little time on the trail or the airwaves touting the centerpiec­e provisions of their party’s $1.9 trillion economic rescue package, which party leaders had hoped would help stave off losses in the House and Senate in midterm elections. In part, that is because the rescue plan has become fodder for Republican­s to attack Democrats over rapidly rising prices, accusing them of overstimul­ating the economy with too much cash.

The economic aid, which was intended to help keep families afloat amid the pandemic, included two centerpiec­e components for households: the direct checks of up to $1,400 for lower- to middle-class individual­s and an expanded child tax credit, worth up to $300 per child per month. It was initially seen as Biden’s signature economic policy achievemen­t, in part because the tax credit dramatical­ly reduced

child poverty last year. Polls suggested Americans knew they had received money and why — giving Democrats hope they would be rewarded politicall­y.

Many campaign strategist­s say voters are not responding to messages about pandemic aid. Some Democrats worry that voters have been swayed by the persistent Republican argument that the aid was the driving factor behind rapidly rising prices of food, rent and other daily staples.

Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contribute­d to accelerati­ng inflation,

although they disagree on how much. Biden administra­tion officials and Democratic candidates reject that characteri­zation. When pressed, they defend their emergency spending, saying it has put the United States on stronger footing than other wealthy nations at a time of rapid global inflation.

Republican­s have spent nearly $150 million on inflation-themed television ads across the country this election cycle, according to data from AdImpact.

Democrats have tried to deflect blame, portraying inflation as the product of global forces like crimped

supply chains while touting their efforts to lower the cost of electricit­y and prescripti­on drugs. They have aired nearly $50 million of their own ads mentioning inflation, often pinning it on corporate profit gouging.

Candidates and independen­t groups that support the stimulus payments have spent just $7 million nationwide on advertisem­ents mentioning the direct checks, the child tax credit or the rescue plan overall, according to AdImpact data.

Far more money has been spent by Democrats on other issues, including $27 million on ads mentioning infrastruc­ture

— another early economic win for Biden — and $95 million on ads that mention abortion rights.

For months after the rescue plan’s passage, Democratic leaders were confident that they had solved an economic policy dilemma that has vexed Democrats and Republican­s stretching back to the George W. Bush administra­tion: They were giving Americans money, but voters weren’t giving them any credit.

Tax cuts and direct spending aid approved by Bush, President Barack Obama and President Donald

Trump failed to win over large swaths of voters and spare incumbent parties from large midterm losses. Economists and strategist­s concluded that was often because Americans had not noticed they had benefited from the policies each president was sure would sway elections.

That was not the case with the direct checks and the child tax credit. People noticed them. But they still have not turned into political selling points at a time of rapid inflation.

As the November elections approach, most voters appear to be motivated by a list of other issues, including abortion, crime and a range of economic concerns.

Warnock’s speech last week to a group of Democrats in Dunwoody, a northern Atlanta suburb, underscore­d that shift in emphasis.

He began the policy section of the rally with a quick nod to the nowexpired child credit, then ticked through a series of provisions from bills that Biden has signed in the last two years: highways and broadband internet tied to a bipartisan infrastruc­ture law, semiconduc­tor plants spurred by a China competitiv­eness law, a gun safety law and aid for veterans exposed to toxic burn pits. He lingered on one piece of Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act: a cap on the cost of insulin for Medicare patients, which Warnock cast as critical for diabetics in Georgia, particular­ly in Black communitie­s.

The direct payments never came up.

His biggest ovation, by far, came when the economics section of his speech had ended, and Warnock had moved on to defending abortion rights.

 ?? JASON GETZ/THE ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTI­ON ?? Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., who is locked in a tight reelection campaign, now speaks little of the checks of up to $1,400 that Democrats had delivered for those digging out of the pandemic recession.
JASON GETZ/THE ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTI­ON Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., who is locked in a tight reelection campaign, now speaks little of the checks of up to $1,400 that Democrats had delivered for those digging out of the pandemic recession.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States