Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Does attacking art change minds?

Guerrilla protesters hurl food to urge action on climate

- By Cara Buckley

First it was cake smeared on the Mona Lisa in Paris, then tomato soup splattered across a van Gogh in London, and then, last Sunday, liquefied mashed potatoes hurled at a Monet in a museum in Potsdam, Germany.

What these actions shared, aside from involving priceless art and carbs, was the intentions of the protesters behind them. Desperate to end complacenc­y about the climate crisis and to pressure government­s to stop the extraction and burning of fossil fuels, they said they had resorted to such high-profile tactics because little else has worked.

None of the paintings were harmed, as all were encased in protective glass. But the actions went viral and set off an internatio­nal storm of outrage and debate. Were the activists misguided attention-seekers who harmed the climate movement’s legitimacy while doing nothing to help the Earth? Or did they force a spotlight onto everything at risk if significan­t climate action isn’t taken fast?

It’s unclear whether throwing food at artwork, which follows a long line of guerrilla protest tactics, was a success.

For the climate activists, the protests amounted to wins, insofar as they nabbed far more attention than anything they’d undertaken yet. Despite decades of lobbying, petitions, marches and civil disobedien­ce, planet-heating fossil fuel emissions are at an all-time high, and the window to avert further climate catastroph­e is closing.

“We tried sitting in the roads, we tried blocking oil terminals, and we got

virtually zero press coverage, yet the thing that gets the most press is chucking some tomato soup on a piece of glass covering a masterpiec­e,” said Mel Carrington, a spokespers­on for Just Stop Oil, the group behind the Oct. 14 soup attack on van Gogh’s “Sunflowers” at the National Gallery in London. After tossing the soup, the two Just Stop Oil activists glued their hands to the wall. “What is worth more, art or life?” asked one, Phoebe Plummer, 21.

Carrington said the act was intended to elicit a visceral reaction, to force people to emotionall­y experience the potential loss of a masterpiec­e. “When you think about it, this is what we face with climate collapse,” she said. “The loss of everything we love.”

The soup action was

inspired in part by an episode in May at the Louvre Museum, in which a protester creamed the glass covering of the Mona Lisa with cake, and urged onlookers to think about the Earth. (Just Stop Oil activists echoed that tactic Monday by smashing chocolate cake onto a waxwork figure of King Charles III.)

“We want to have this conversati­on, and to bring it around to our demand about what we need to do to avoid climate breakdown and collapse,” Carrington said.

In Germany, climate activists took notice. Carla Hinrichs, a spokespers­on for the group Last Generation, said her first reaction was disbelief until she saw how Just Stop Oil was using the moment to highlight the planned expansion of oil and gas exploratio­n off

England’s coast.

“I realized it was genius,” Hinrichs said. “People get shocked, and then this window opens where they start listening.”

On Oct. 23, two activists with Last Generation headed into the Museum Barberini in Potsdam and, in a nod to Germany’s penchant for spuds, tossed runny yellow mashed potatoes onto the glass front of Monet’s “Grainstack­s,” which sold for nearly $111 million in 2019. “Our win is when politician­s react to the climate crisis,” Hinrichs said. “This is a step on the way, one that people talk about, that’s not ignorable.”

Hinrichs and Carrington said their groups had made certain the artworks were protected by glass, and in all three instances the museums said the paintings

were unharmed, except for minor damage to at least one of the frames. Some museums are now looking to step up security, and the Barberini announced it would temporaril­y close until Sunday. There are also concerns about a potential “art protection crisis” that could see works being hidden away or permanentl­y ruined.

Art has been targeted by protesters before. Suffragist­s attacked a series of artworks a century ago, with one slashing “The Toilet of Venus” by Diego Velázquez with a meat cleaver and getting lashed for it in the press.

The soup and potato museum protests similarly elicited shock and confusion. “Embarrassi­ng confession: Did not know that climate change was caused by French impression­ists,” Scott Shapiro, a professor at Yale University, said on Twitter. Conspiracy theories blossomed about the activists’ motives, as both groups received backing from the Climate Emergency Fund, a nonprofit organizati­on to which oil heir Aileen Getty and director Adam McKay have been significan­t donors.

Benjamin Sovacool, a professor of earth and the environmen­t at Boston University, said the most effective social movements employed sustained and intense pressure for long periods of time, and that one measure of an action’s success was how much it builds a coalition or alienates people. While the museum protests were polarizing, he said, “at least we’re talking about it.”

 ?? ISABEL INFANTES/GETTY-AFP ?? An environmen­tal activist with Just Stop Oil sprays paint Oct. 16 on the window of an Aston Martin showroom in London.
ISABEL INFANTES/GETTY-AFP An environmen­tal activist with Just Stop Oil sprays paint Oct. 16 on the window of an Aston Martin showroom in London.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States