Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

A new generation offers new hope for abortion rights

- Clarence Page cpage@chicagotri­bune.com Twitter @cptime

Elections send messages. When the voters failed to come up with the “red wave” for which Republican­s dreamed, they did happen to send a very different message of hope: Reproducti­ve rights are making a comeback.

That was not necessaril­y supposed to happen, if you followed the convention­al wisdom of pollsters and pundits in the days leading up to the midterms.

In the backlash immediatel­y following the Supreme Court’s blockbuste­r Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision in June, Democrats saw a surge in support as the party that would more reliably work to restore abortion rights.

But those hopes began to fade as more recent polls showed abortion losing ground as a motivating issue for voters as Republican­s hammered President Joe Biden’s approval ratings over such issues as runaway inflation — an unwelcome byproduct of the administra­tion’s pandemic relief measures — and a perceived rise in crime rates.

Yet, Republican­s stopped measuring the drapes for a Republican takeover when their red wave failed to materializ­e — and everyone’s attention turned to the question of “why?”

Sure, Democrats were expected to suffer losses of congressio­nal seats because of the midterm curse that traditiona­lly afflicts the party not occupying the White House. But this time, exit polls show, they avoided a rout largely because of an unexpected resurgence of fear and rage over abortion rights overturned by Dobbs.

“Abortion is on the line,” said Democrats, and in four states it quite literally was.

A record number of abortion-related proposals popped up on ballots this year, according to the National Conference of State Legislatur­es.

In Michigan, Vermont and California, voters in Tuesday’s elections overwhelmi­ngly approved ballot initiative­s that will enshrine the right to abortion in their state constituti­ons.

Yet, as critics, such as I, have argued, that states’ rights approach creates a confusing crazy-quilt patchwork of reproducti­ve rights, an injustice to rights of women — rights too fundamenta­l in my view to be dependent solely on which state you happen to be in.

In traditiona­lly conservati­ve Kentucky, voters rejected a state constituti­onal amendment that would have protected the state’s near-total abortion ban from legal challenges.

And in Montana, voters rejected a measure that would have criminaliz­ed health care providers who do not make every effort to save the life of an infant “born during an attempted abortion” or after labor or Caesarean section.

Those stunning departures from conservati­ve expectatio­ns followed an earlier surprise in Kansas, where voters in August decided overwhelmi­ngly to reject a proposed amendment to remove protection­s for reproducti­ve rights from the state’s constituti­on.

Some will see this apparent trend as a backhanded vindicatio­n of Justice Samuel Alito’s reasoning in Dobbs that abortion rights should be left up to the states. Yet, as critics, such as I, have argued, that states’ rights approach creates a confusing crazy-quilt patchwork of reproducti­ve rights, an injustice to rights of women — rights too fundamenta­l in my view to be dependent solely on which state you happen to be in.

That was the situation before Roe, the 1973 decision that infuriated abortion opponents enough to fuel the rise of a “right to life” movement and “Christian right” that since the 1970s has become one of the most effective and powerful organizing engines in the Republican Party.

Many have wondered ever since whether a similarly effective organizati­onal engine might rise on the left if Roe was overturned. Maybe we’re seeing the answer now and it appears to be coming largely from generation­s too young to remember the days before Roe.

As one who remembers the days before Roe and what I saw as a terrible injustice to the right of women to have autonomy over their own bodies, I have long wondered how long it would take for younger voters, who usually have the lowest voter turnout, to wake up to this issue.

That day appears to have come. Abortion was the single-most important issue for a quarter of all voters in the midterms, according to Kaiser Health News, and for a third of women under age 50. NBC News exit polls placed the importance of abortion even higher, with 32% of voters saying inflation was their top voting issue and abortion ranking second at 27%.

As my own elders used to say, you don’t really appreciate something until you don’t have it any more.

Young folks should understand that message more forcefully after the Dobbs decision. They also should understand that rights, once won, must be watchfully protected. Otherwise, down the road, you can find yourselves fighting for the same rights all over again.

 ?? ??
 ?? CHRIS SWEDA/CHICAGO TRIBUNE ?? People march in protest through downtown Chicago on June 25 after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
CHRIS SWEDA/CHICAGO TRIBUNE People march in protest through downtown Chicago on June 25 after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States