Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Libertaria­n shakes up the status quo

‘Armed and gay’ Oliver pushes Ga. Senate race in runoff

- By Richard Fausset

ATLANTA — Chase Oliver’s political positionin­g can come across as both intriguing and a little hard to categorize: He’s a Libertaria­n who proudly describes himself as “armed and gay.”

In his bid to become the next U.S. senator from Georgia, he raised a mere $7,790 through the end of June. And he earned just over 2% of the total vote.

Yet his losing effort could have a tremendous impact on the nation’s politics. His candidacy has denied a majority of the vote to Raphael Warnock, the Democratic incumbent, and Herschel Walker, the Republican challenger, forcing them into a Dec. 6 runoff.

Oliver said he had no regrets. The problem, he said, was the system, and he objected to the idea that he was spoiling anything.

“I don’t think you can spoil something that’s already rotten,” he said. “And I think that’s what the two-party system in Washington, D.C., currently is — it’s rotten.”

Third-party candidates are nothing new in American politics. Theodore Roosevelt played a significan­t spoiler role in the 1912 presidenti­al election as a member of the Progressiv­e, or “Bull Moose” Party. And in 2000, Ralph Nader was accused by some of helping George W. Bush win Florida and the presidency.

In recent years, a couple of Libertaria­n Party candidates have had an outsize influence, particular­ly in elections that have turned on a few percentage points.

In 2020, the Libertaria­n presidenti­al candidate, Jo Jorgensen, made a modest showing in several key states — enough, it is believed, to

have tipped that election in favor of

Joe Biden.

That same year in Georgia, the Libertaria­n Senate candidate, Shane Hazel, earned 115,039 votes in the general election, more than the margin that separated David Perdue, the Republican incumbent, from Jon Ossoff, the Democratic challenger. Ossoff went on to defeat Perdue in a runoff.

Oliver noted that other stable democracie­s have more than two viable political parties and that he was the only candidate in the Georgia race that had supported ranked-choice voting “as a means to no longer have runoffs in the future.”

“I want to save the taxpayers millions of dollars and

prevent future runoffs that take weeks, and cost millions of dollars to facilitate,” he said.

On Wednesday, Oliver squeezed in time for his interview among the demands of his day job as a human resources executive. (He has a second job at a financial services company.) He said he was not planning on endorsing either of the candidates, but was hoping to host a candidate forum that would allow them to speak at length to Libertaria­n and independen­t voters.

All of this only adds to the mystery of who will win the support of his 80,000-plus voters in the runoff — that is, if they turn anywhere.

Historical­ly, Republican­s in Georgia have had

the upper hand in most statewide runoff elections. But some political watchers think the coming runoff could favor Warnock, given Walker’s extensive record of personal scandals and false statements.

Some of Oliver’s supporters may have been Republican­s who could not bring themselves to vote for Walker, said Charles Bullock, a political scientist at the University of Georgia.

“Will they bother to come back?” Bullock said. “Will they vote at all in the next round?”

Oliver, writing on Twitter on Wednesday, said he believed his support came from across the political spectrum. “Libertaria­n votes came from all types,” he said. It was not a left- or right-wing philosophy, he said, but rather, “it’s the right

to be left alone.”

Oliver’s positions reflect that sentiment, with something to both attract and repel liberals and conservati­ves. On the question of guns, he described himself as a “strict Second Amendment supporter,” but he also is in favor of a woman’s right to choose abortion. (Although he also noted that as a small-government disciple, he supports the Hyde Amendment, which bans federal Medicaid funding for abortion.)

On Wednesday, Jorgensen said in an interview that Libertaria­n candidates like Oliver inject cuttingedg­e ideas into the national discussion, noting her party had supported gay rights and cannabis legalizati­on long before they were mainstream.

“If it were up to the Democrats

to come up with some of the social liberties that we now have, we would still be waiting,” she said.

Oliver was able to present his ideas to a wide audience in mid-October during a debate in Atlanta with Warnock. Walker did not attend.

The first question went to Oliver, who was asked why third-party candidates tend to not break through. Oliver compared the two major parties to pro wrestlers.

“It’s like having two people in a ring who are really pretending to fight each other,” he said. Then they go backstage, he added, and laugh about how “they got so much attention.”

The next question went to Warnock, who ignored the insult. Instead, he spoke of the man he called “my opponent,” the absent Walker.

 ?? BEN GRAY/AP ?? Libertaria­n challenger Chase Oliver, left, and incumbent Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock square off in a debate Oct. 16 in Atlanta.
BEN GRAY/AP Libertaria­n challenger Chase Oliver, left, and incumbent Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock square off in a debate Oct. 16 in Atlanta.
 ?? ?? Walker
Walker

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States