ABOUT MILITARY JUSTICE REFORM

Kirsten Gillibrand would not give up. The New York senator labored for a decade to reform how the military justice system works (and doesn’t work). And now she has prevailed. The thousands of annual cases of sexual assault and rape in the ranks will be handled like crimes among civilians, not brushed aside or even ignored by the brass.

The generals and the admirals, stuck in their traditions, wanted to keep military commanders in charge of the prosecutions of major crimes instead of handing it to independent legal professionals, as should have happened long ago. And with the Pentagon’s resistance came resistance from the Pentagon’s pals on Capitol Hill, notably Jack Reed, the West Pointer from Rhode Island chairing the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Even though Gillibrand had a bipartisan two-thirds of the Senate as co-sponsors of her Military Justice Improvement and Increasing Prevention Act, Reed was too powerful and always thwarted the reforms. But Gillibrand was the tougher of the two and this year she won across the board.

Under the measures just tucked into the defense authorization bill, all the judicial powers will be removed from commanders in major crimes, including murder and kidnapping. No longer will officers oversee prosecutions and jury selection in courts martial will be randomized …

It shouldn’t have taken so very long for Gillibrand to achieve what was obvious at the outset. But senator by senator, she argued her just cause for years. Until this year, when even Reed had to finally agree that this is the better way.