Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Build EVs we’d love to drive

A few things automakers should do to improve electric cars in ’23

- By Hannah Elliott

The new Toyota Prius doesn’t cut it. Not by a long shot. The redesigned hybrid that debuted in November at the Los Angeles Auto Show won critical applause for its improved body. It looks less like a medical appliance from the 1980s and more like a pretty teardrop.

But the econo-appliance routinely owned by the nation’s absolute worst drivers (proven time and again by unscientif­ic studies conducted by moi) is not the electric vehicle we deserve.

We deserve something that looks so good, we glance back after parking near one. Something that makes us smile like a 9-year-old on helium gas and summer break when we press the accelerato­r. We need something that we drive because we love it, not because the neighbors say it’s “the right thing to do.”

As somebody who drives cars for a living, here’s what I think EVs should be in 2023 and thereafter.

EVs must become less expensive

To start with, sticker shock.

The average price of an electric vehicle in the U.S. is $66,000, a 13% increase over 2021, according to Kelley Blue Book. The average price for an internal combustion engine vehicle is $48,000. You can see evidence of this disparity simply by driving around Anytown, USA: Count how many EVs you see in upscale neighborho­ods versus working-class and poor neighborho­ods. The disparity is sinful.

EVs need to fix quality control — and quick

If you’re going to charge a price premium for a product, it had better be worth it. I’m tired of startups like Lucid, Rivian, Tesla, Fisker and Faraday Future expecting to get a pass on inferior quality just because they claim to be saving the world.

EV makers owe consumers cars that are built well, with quality and performanc­e befitting their price tags.

Since their inception, electric vehicles from startup companies have polluted the automotive gene pool with shoddy manufactur­ing, poor craftsmans­hip, unreliable technology, unsafe driving systems and cheap components. (One horror story had Rivian managers fishing damaged electrical cables out of the trash and telling staff to use them in new products, Bloomberg reported in January.)

According to JD Power’s most recent initial-quality study, overall quality in new vehicles dropped 11% this year; the biggest drops came from EV makers including Polestar and Tesla.

I’ve seen the failure to produce quality products firsthand, from the uneven body panels notorious at Tesla to the easily removed components I saw in the Lucid Air and the finicky technology I experience­d in the Rivian truck. Those surfaced in press loaner vehicles, which are meant to represent the best of what the company has to offer. I can’t imagine what a year of driving them as daily commuter cars might do, but it can’t be pretty. Consumers and even employees have complained — and filed suit.

JD Power’s director of global automotive, David Amodeo, said in a statement about the quality report that the pandemic put a damper on the industry. But he noted that the intense level of expertise required to make an EV is what has dragged down quality for everyone.

“Automakers continue to launch vehicles that are more and more technologi­cally complex in an era in which there have been many shortages of critical components to support them,” Amodeo said.

EVs need better charging

I’m not going to ask for more range or extended battery life for EVs in 2023. I know that’s coming, and study after study shows that most Americans drive fewer than 40 miles a day, anyway. Charge time is what makes me anxious.

But this isn’t just about charging faster. In 2023, EVs will need to charge better. They need to improve the charging experience.

I’ve spent more than my share of time hanging around dodgy parking lots and shopping centers, and anyone who owns an EV will empathize. It’s never as simple as just driving to a charging station and plugging in. That perfect scenario assumes an empty charger that’s convenient­ly close to your normal driving route and actually works. These variables are far from assured, even in California — the biggest market for EVs in the U.S. — let alone Boston, Dallas or Miami.

Meanwhile, the time required to charge a vehicle depends on such things as the state of the batteries in the car; the specific charger; how many others are plugged in beside you; and even the weather on a given day.

EVs need sex appeal

Finally, my personal favorite: EVs must become sexy. I would say “sexier” but that would imply they already have some allure. Apart from a few hypercars such as the Rimac Nevera and Pininfarin­a Battista — and for those few who fetishize the Prius (see: Rule 34 of the internet) — they don’t.

Sex and affordabil­ity can coexist. Ferrari’s Dino was a bargain basement offer when it debuted in the 1950s — Ferrari wouldn’t even put its name on it — but I defy anyone to say that the Italian stallion isn’t a stunner. See also: the Graduate’s Alfa Duetto Spider and that smoking-hot Fiat Abarth commercial.

Here’s the problem: Modern EVs sprang from the grass roots of those who procured used French-fry oil or tinkered with solar panels before sustainabi­lity was much of a dream. It’s a group that, while admirably forward-thinking, includes your oddball neighbor and, well, Elon Musk. These are the opposite of aesthetes; just check out Musk’s nightstand.

The efficiency-at-allcost mentality meant that early EVs were designed for humble practicali­ty, resulting in such things as worn-out Volvo composites powered by biofuel and the Tesla Roadster. Even in final form, the Chevy Bolt, Nissan Leaf, Lucid Air and Tesla Model 3 feel like neutered versions of four-wheel transport — or worse, incel versions of a car.

The best we have — Porsche Taycan, MercedesBe­nz EQS, Audi e-Tron — do possess a certain level of attraction. But they’re sedans, not sexpots. They do not have the makings of a Pirelli calendar photo shoot, so to speak, if the shoot were to include actual cars.

What we need are EVs that prioritize beauty over reduced drag and less battery drain. If we could afford to sacrifice some efficiency for shapelier arches or angular edges, some dramatic flair across the body lines, it would go a long way toward getting our blood going. Why not electrify that new Porsche 911 Dakar? That could be sexy in a Moroccan desert kind of way.

 ?? TOYOTA ?? The 2023 Prius Prime plug-in hybrid is not the electric vehicle we deserve, writes Hannah Elliott.
TOYOTA The 2023 Prius Prime plug-in hybrid is not the electric vehicle we deserve, writes Hannah Elliott.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States