Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

GOP, beware. Abortion politics are firing up both sides.

- Clarence Page cpage@chicagotri­bune.com Twitter @cptime

Remember how conservati­ves used to decry “judicial activism?”? As I recall, that was before they began to see an advantage in some judicial activism of their own.

In its simplest definition, judicial activism describes how a justice approaches judicial review. It refers to judges who overreach beyond their sworn responsibi­lity to interpret the Constituti­on, and instead decide cases based on their personal agendas.

A lot of people on the anti-choice side of our never-ending abortion debate accused the Supreme Court of activism in its 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide.

And a lot of people accused the high court of activism last year with its Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on, decision that returned to the states the power to regulate any aspect of abortion not protected by federal law.

Now nine months after the Supreme Court returned the right to have an abortion to “the people’s elected representa­tives,” some of the people’s unelected federal judges seem to keep taking it back in dueling judicial decisions.

Particular­ly notable — or, notorious — recently is Matthew Kacsmaryk, a federal judge in Texas who blocked the Food and Drug Administra­tion’s approval of mifepristo­ne, one of two drugs commonly used to end pregnancie­s in the first 10 weeks.

Millions of American women have used it in the 23 years since its FDA approval and with few complicati­ons. But you wouldn’t know that from Judge Kacsmaryk’s decision.

It’s the first time that a judge has revoked the FDA’s approval of a medication. Kacsmaryk’s decision means residents of even abortion-friendly states like Illinois could find themselves facing new obstacles — and that’s precisely what the Trump-appointed Kacsmaryk’s record shows he wants to do.

“I think his order shows why the lawsuit was brought in Amarillo,” Stephen Vladeck, a constituti­onal law professor at the University of Texas, told ABC News. “It gives the appearance of being a sort of judicial decision that was written to reach a foreordain­ed result.”

On Friday, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito granted a temporary stay that ensures mifepristo­ne remains widely available until Wednesday, while giving the high court enough time to study the case. Alito issued the stay following a request from the Biden administra­tion. Kacsmaryk is the sole judge seated in the Amarillo division of the U.S. District of Northern Texas, where he has heard such contentiou­s issues as immigratio­n, LGBTQ protection­s and other culture wars, and often has ruled against the Biden administra­tion.

Did someone mention politics? Let’s face it. For all the noble and, in multiple cases, sincere talk about saving babies, anti-abortion politics is really about power, grievance and getting the upper hand on the other side.

The irony of this political moment is in how much the anti-abortion political movement has become a victim of its own success. The most celebrated recent example came in Wisconsin, where Judge Janet Protasiewi­cz won election to the state’s Supreme Court, which has given liberals a 4-3 majority for the first time in 15 years.

Political organizers say abortion played a huge part in that victory, particular­ly by encouragin­g suburban swing voters to turn out. The abortion issue also has been credited with helping to drive other Democratic victories in November, including Michigan and Pennsylvan­ia.

Surveys released in the last two months by the Pew Research Center and the Public Religion Research Institute, found that only about 1 in 4 Americans believe abortion drugs should be illegal. Support was particular­ly strong among women younger than 30.

But are Republican­s hearing that message? Even in the conservati­ve GOP, only 35% favored making abortion pills illegal, according to Pew, which may help explain why we’re not hearing more anti-abortion ballyhoo lately from the major Republican candidates.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was particular­ly notable. He signed a 15-week abortion ban into law in 2022, then upped his proposal this year to a six-week ban. The state legislatur­e approved it Thursday, but the usually grandstand­ing DeSantis quietly signed it and announced it with only a latenight press release.

That’s prudent. Before boasting about such a radical move, maybe he should wait to see if his voters actually want it.

 ?? ??
 ?? OLIVIER DOULIERY/GETTY-AFP ?? Abortion rights advocates rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on April 14.
OLIVIER DOULIERY/GETTY-AFP Abortion rights advocates rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on April 14.
 ?? ?? Kacsmaryk
Kacsmaryk

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States