Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

Lead and forever chemicals in our water are inflicting harm on our kids. There is a path forward.

- By Paul Vallas Paul Vallas is an adviser for the Illinois Policy Institute. He ran for Chicago mayor this year and in 2019 and was previously budget director for the city and CEO of Chicago Public Schools.

Chicago continues to ignore a serious epidemic facing our children — lead contaminat­ion in drinking water, which does irreversib­le damage to children and has been doing so for generation­s.

No amount of lead in drinking water is safe. It slows growth and developmen­tal learning and contribute­s to behavioral, hearing and speech problems. Epidemiolo­gical studies have also establishe­d it contribute­s to lower IQs and decreased ability to pay attention and perform well in school.

Many of the chronic challenges that disproport­ionately afflict low-income communitie­s in Chicago — from underachie­vement in school and poor mental and physical health to higher rates of violent crime — could be attributed to generation­s of lead contaminat­ion. And the adverse effects continue beyond childhood.

There is a connection between lead contaminat­ion and violent crime. A 2007 study by economist Rick Nevin analyzing crime data from the U.S., the United Kingdom, Canada, France and five other Western countries showed correlatio­ns between preschoola­ged lead exposure and violent crime.

Research compiled by Environmen­tal Internatio­nal in 2012 has documented the urban rise and fall of air lead emissions levels and surge and retreat of societal violence. A 2007 report published by The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, written by Jessica Wolpaw Reyes of Amherst College, found that between 1992 and 2002, the phaseout of lead in gasoline in the U.S. “was responsibl­e for approximat­ely a 56% decline in violent crime.”

We should, of course, be cautious about assigning all the credit for a social phenomenon to one cause. But the plummeting homicide rate nonetheles­s is a reminder that environmen­tal regulation­s are not just nice rules that limit pollution; they also have a real impact on the health of American families and perhaps in the lives of everyday people. Keep that in mind the next time someone tells you about the “cost” of environmen­tal regulation.

As if lead contaminat­ion were not enough of a problem, earlier this year, a Chicago Tribune investigat­ion revealed that lead poisoning is not the only crisis affecting the city’s water supply. The investigat­ion showed that extremely worrisome concentrat­ions of toxic PFAS — perand polyfluoro­alkyl substances — have been found in water throughout Illinois. Scientists are finding that even tiny concentrat­ions of these “forever chemicals” can trigger testicular and kidney cancer, birth defects, liver damage, impaired fertility, immune system disorders, high cholestero­l and obesity.

In an extraordin­arily tonedeaf and outright negligent response, the Chicago Department of Water Management said it doesn’t plan to upgrade its treatment plants to address PFAS unless the city is required to by the federal government despite there being no safe level of exposure, according to the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency. This mirrors the department’s lack of urgency in addressing

the lead crisis. City crews have replaced less than half of 1% of the almost 400,000 lead service lines responsibl­e for contaminat­ing Chicagoans.

At the city’s current pace of lead pipe replacemen­t, it would take 500 years to complete the work. There is a simple pathway to quickly protect city residents, especially poor families and children, from lead and forever chemicals while embarking on an accelerate­d campaign to replace lead pipes.

First, aggressive­ly distribute water filtration systems to any home, apartment building, school, child care center and eatery that needs one. The water department should select vendors with proven filtration systems, prequalify­ing providers and controllin­g costs through strategic sourcing. The school district would need only a fraction of its remaining COVID-19 funds to help families and early childhood providers secure water filtration systems.

Second, accelerate lead service line replacemen­t by raising needed funds through dedicated revenue bonds financed with revenues from expiring TIFs. Financing lead service line replacemen­t is also a permissibl­e use of federal COVID-19 funds. The American Jobs Act also provides billions of dollars for lead pipe removal. Of course, even if funds are available, the city will need to remove the regulatory obstacles to use more innovative approaches to accelerate lead pipe replacemen­t like officials did in Newark, New Jersey.

Newark addressed its lead crisis quickly by making available and installing water filtration systems in every at-risk home while nearly completing replacemen­t of lead service lines in two years. Flint, Michigan, whose lead water contaminat­ion was a national scandal, is close to completing its replacemen­t of its lead service lines.

The water crisis adds to the urgency for Chicago to reinstate the Department of the Environmen­t, to not only drive clean water plans but also to deal with other critical issues facing the city such as environmen­tal injustice, the need to implement a climate action plan and food desserts. Chicago has the largest life expectancy gap across neighborho­ods among the largest 500 cities in the country, according to a new analysis by the New York University School of Medicine. How much of that is related to the environmen­t?

Contaminat­ed drinking water is an epidemic of devastatin­g consequenc­es in poor communitie­s. There is a clear pathway for addressing the lead and forever chemicals in our water before more damage is done.

It’s time to get the lead out.

 ?? ANTONIO PEREZ/CHICAGO TRIBUNE ?? A contractor works on a lead service line connected to a water main on South Ridgeway Avenue in Chicago on April 10.
ANTONIO PEREZ/CHICAGO TRIBUNE A contractor works on a lead service line connected to a water main on South Ridgeway Avenue in Chicago on April 10.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States