Chicago Tribune (Sunday)

ABOUT U.S. VETO OF CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION

- New York Daily News Editorial Board

How many times does the United States have to veto a misguided UN Security Council resolution on the Israel/ Hamas war until the other countries on the council understand that Hamas must be condemned by name, the fighting should stop and all the Israeli hostages kidnapped on Oct. 7 have to be released?

The answer is at least three, as this week U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield correctly cast another U.S. veto on the war, following ones in October and December. The problem with this current resolution, offered by Algeria, is that again Hamas went blameless and there was no causation between a pause in the combat and freedom for the hostages.

Thomas-Greenfield says that she is working on a draft resolution to do just that, but it faces a veto threat by the peace loving Chinese and Russians, who jointly vetoed an October resolution because it was too harsh on the murderers and rapists of Hamas.

Beijing and Moscow are striving to sow as much discord as they can while Washington is trying to achieve a ceasefire and the return of the hostages. American diplomacy, working with Qatar and Egypt, succeeded earlier and negotiatio­ns are still underway.

War is horrible and Hamas started this war, bringing death and destructio­n to the people of Israel, which has brought death and destructio­n to the Gaza Strip as the cowards of Hamas hide among the innocent Palestinia­n civilians. …

While Hamas doesn’t care about the Palestinia­n civilians, as they see every death as another martyr in their holy war to annihilate the Jews, they do want the fighting to stop before all of the terrorists and the ring leaders have been taken out. So how to make sure that every hostage is released when the guns go silent? That is what Thomas-Greenfield is seeking.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States