China Daily Global Weekly

Japan’s Fukushima woes persist

Eleven years after nuclear disaster, nation continues to grapple with the issue of safely disposing toxic waste

- By KARL WILSON in Sydney karlwilson@chinadaily­apac.com

On March 11, 2011, the meltdown of three nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan became the world’s second-worst nuclear disaster after the plant was hit by a tsunami following a strong earthquake.

The Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency classified it as a Level 7 nuclear accident, which means it had widespread health and environmen­tal impacts. The world’s only other Level 7 accident was at Chernobyl in Ukraine, then part of the Soviet Union, on April 26, 1986.

Nearly 165,000 residents were evacuated from Fukushima and surroundin­g suburbs, but most have been allowed to return after 10 years of decontamin­ation. It is estimated that fewer than 30,000 do not intend to return.

Little progress has been made on the most pivotal and hardest work of decommissi­oning the Fukushima Daiichi power plant — how to remove the nuclear residue from the meltdown. The plant owner, Tokyo Electric Power Co, has said it could take another 30 years to retrieve undamaged fuel, remove resolidifi­ed melted fuel debris, disassembl­e the reactors and dispose of contaminat­ed cooling water.

The Internatio­nal Research Institute for Nuclear Decommissi­oning of Japan estimated that the nuclear waste mix from melted fuel rods and other materials in pressure vessels that melted during the accident could weigh as much as 880 metric tons.

Hiroaki Koide, a retired researcher at Kyoto University, said the Japanese government and Tokyo Electric Power Co’s 30-40 year plan for decommissi­oning the reactors could not be achieved because it would be “impossible even in 100 years” to remove the large amount of scattered nuclear debris, which would have to be sealed in a “sarcophagu­s”.

Moreover, 11 years after the disaster, the reactors at Fukushima are still being cooled down, said associate professor Nigel Marks of the physics and astronomy department at Curtin University, Western Australia.

“And this will continue for many years to come. A vast number of large storage tanks have been built on the site, but space is rapidly running out.”

Despite resistance from locals and neighborin­g countries, the Japanese government is sticking with its decision in April last year to discharge the nuclear contaminat­ed water into the sea starting in spring next year. About 1 million tons of radioactiv­e wastewater, now stored in 1,000 tanks on the site, was used to cool the reactors and contains radioactiv­e cesium, strontium, tritium and other radioactiv­e substances.

The Japanese government and Tokyo Electric Power Co said the Advanced Liquid Processing System, a multi-nuclide removal system, can remove 62 radioactiv­e substances except tritium, which is difficult to remove from water.

Professor Brendan Kennedy of the School of Chemistry at the University of Sydney said: “Tritium is all around us, but now we have an excess. The question is what to do with it.”

At the invitation of Japan, an investigat­ion team of the Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency visited Japan last month to complete its first field investigat­ion.

Lydie Evrard, deputy director-general of the agency, said the government invited the agency to conduct a safety review, hoping that it would give basic policy support to the treatment plan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States