Canberra too quick to judge Honiara
Solomon Islands’ security pact with China does not target any third parties, analysts say
Asecurity pact between China and the Solomon Islands does not target any third parties and criticism from Australian right-wing officials and commentators is an overreaction, according to analysts.
Officials from China and the Solomon Islands had “initialed” a draft agreement that “awaits signatures of the two countries’ foreign ministers”, a statement issued by the Solomon Islands government’s communications unit said on March 31.
Australia, the United States and New Zealand have raised concerns about the deal, but the Solomon Islands said it would continue to uphold its foreign policy of “friends to all and enemies to none”.
Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare said in a speech on March 29 that there was “no intention whatsoever to ask China to build a military base in the Solomon Islands” as had been reported earlier by Australian media.
“Where does that nonsense come from? The security treaty ... is pursued at the request of the Solomon Islands’ government,” Sogavare said.
With an election due in Australia in May, Prime Minister Scott Morrison and officials from his party are using security as an election issue.
Canberra, without any evidence, claims it is convinced that China wants to establish a naval base in the Solomon Islands, which are located some 2,000 kilometers off the northern
Australian coast.
Tarcisius Tara Kabutaulaka, an associate professor and director of the University of Hawaii’s Center for Pacific Islands Studies, said he doubts the claim.
“Foreign military outposts are not how Beijing operates. It currently has only one overseas base in Djibouti in the Horn of Africa. This is in contrast
to the United States, with an estimated 750 bases in 80 countries,” he said in an opinion article written for Sydney-based think tank The Lowy Institute.
James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at University of Technology Sydney, also said the reaction from Canberra was not “justified”.
“If the draft agreement is an indication of what the final agreement will be, then there are a whole lot of people in Canberra who are jumping three steps ahead of where the cooperation between the Solomon Islands and China is actually at,” Laurenceson said.
“This is standard practice now,” said Laurenceson, referring to Canberra
immediately projecting its “worst fears onto what appears to be a modest agreement”.
The Solomon Islands was rocked by unrest last November when protesters tried to storm the parliament in the capital, Honiara. They went on a three-day rampage, torching much of Honiara’s Chinatown. Afterward China provided police supplies and dispatched a police advisory team to help enhance local capabilities at the request of the Solomon Islands.
China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said on March 29: “Normal law enforcement and security cooperation between China and Solomon Islands, two independent countries, is consistent with international law and customary international practice.”
At a news briefing on March 31, Wang specified three points. First, security cooperation between China and the Solomon Islands is based on equality and mutual benefits.
Second, the bilateral security cooperation agreement aims to deepen cooperation in such areas as maintaining social order, protecting people’s lives and property, humanitarian assistance and natural disaster relief.
Third, the security cooperation between the two countries does not target any third parties, and is not in conflict with the Solomon Islands’ cooperation with other countries.
“Pacific Island countries offer a big platform for international cooperation and should not be seen as the ‘backyard’ of some country, still less an arena for major-power rivalry,” Wang said.