China Daily Global Weekly

Ukraine victim of Western falsehoods

The world is witnessing another internal war among white Christian people, underminin­g peace

- By SONG LUZHENG The author is a Chinese political scientist based in France and a researcher at the China Institute, Fudan University in Shanghai.

The “largest war” in Europe after World War II, as described by the West led by the United States, seems to be continuing amid the constant flow of arms to Ukraine from Western countries, especially the US.

More people now realize the Russian-Ukraine conflict has been the inevitable product of the Western-dominated internatio­nal order as well as the US’ anti-Russia maneuvers.

To begin with, from the perspectiv­e of the geographic regions, this is an internal war of Europe. No matter how one interprets European civilizati­on, one thing is indisputab­le: Europe is a region within which wars broke out very frequently in the course of human history. Even after paying an immense price, the continent is yet to resolve the issue of war and peace.

From the view of civilizati­on, it is an internal war of the white Christian world, rather than a war between different civilizati­ons and races. From this viewpoint, the paradigm of a “clash of civilizati­ons” — that was raised by American political scientist Samuel Huntington — is wrong.

What truly threatens world peace is not the conflict between and among different civilizati­ons, but an internal war of the white Christian world.

The history of Christiani­ty shows that it lacks tolerance, which is demonstrat­ed not only through its atrocities against so-called heretics, but also through the infighting between and among the different sects within a religion.

The most serious religious war in Europe was between Protestant­ism and Catholicis­m. Lying behind today’s Russo-Ukrainian conflict is Orthodoxy and Catholicis­m.

Third, no matter how the Western civilizati­on evolves, the contempora­ry world is still a jungle society that lacks justice. Even in the case of a powerful country like Russia, it has been repeatedly humiliated and suppressed by the West.

In its nature, the action launched by Russia counts as the reckoning of all the acts of the West after the Cold War.

The West attacks Russia by claiming that it has violated the UN Charter. Nonetheles­s, not long ago, the

West just did everything that Russia has done. In just one example, it rushed to recognize the independen­ce of breakaway republics which led to the dismemberm­ent of Yugoslavia.

It is just that the West has the means to speak louder. For example, in 2019, Ukraine introduced a law “on ensuring the functionin­g of Ukrainian as the state language”, which stipulates that all local selfgovern­ing bodies must use Ukrainian rather than Russian. If this kind of thing had happened in China, the label of “cultural extinction” would have been posted long ago. But the West has said nothing to Ukraine.

Fourth, under the current internatio­nal system, a country’s security serves as its highest national interest and strategy, but pursuit of security by Western countries often is a zerosum game. The eastward expansion of NATO maximizes its own interest, which resulted in Russia, for the sake of its own security, choosing to send troops to Ukraine.

Looking back at history, a world dominated by the West can neither eliminate wars, nor bring long-lasting peace. Instead, the East Asian order led by China can achieve sustainabl­e peace.

The Chinese civilizati­on lays stress on stability and harmony with diversity, which requires peace and order.

No doubt the lessons of Ukraine are thought-provoking.

First, it did not focus on economy and people’s livelihood. When the Soviet Union collapsed, Ukraine, then the second largest state in Europe, was filled with hopes for the future.

What none could have imagined, however, was that after its democratiz­ation, Ukraine’s economy had a disastrous performanc­e, and its people’s living standards plummeted.

Second, the Ukrainian political elite has not been able to comprehend the West’s stand, and thought it can really join the European Union or NATO, failing to understand that Ukraine will hardly ever be able to meet the conditions — it is required to complete draconian reforms to adapt to more than 200 EU directives and nearly 150 rules.

In 2013, the Ukrainian parliament overruled some bills that were aimed to help meet the EU’s demands, due to their high economic costs. This triggered massive protests and the then government of former president Viktor Yanukovych was toppled, directly leading to the Crimea incident.

The West, led by the US, only uses Ukraine as a tool to deal with Russia, and it is in the interest of the West to let Russia consume its energy on Ukraine.

Third, there is the bitter price of “democratiz­ation”. Ukraine’s political system was establishe­d overnight by transplant­ing the so-called democratic system of the West.

From the point of view of geopolitic­s, Ukraine is sandwiched between Russia and the West. Each side fully penetrates through Ukraine’s system, supporting its own political forces that align with their wish. This is why after democratiz­ation Ukraine began to see continuous “color revolution­s”.

Ukraine’s internal contradict­ions today appear indissolub­le, and its external gaming is also a zero-sum game. Sadly, Western democracy has magnified these two factors to the maximum.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States