Sunnylands offers climate hope

China-US statement rekindles prospect that joint efforts can abate environmental crisis

The recent meeting between the leaders of China and the United States attracted considerable attention but that should not detract from the importance of the Sunnylands statement, which showcases their joint commitment to address climate issues.

Because of the three years of the COVID-19 pandemic and escalating geopolitical tensions, global efforts to combat climate change have faced hurdles and even regressed.

In this context, the Sunnylands declaration undeniably brings the much-awaited warmth of hope. Particularly on the eve of the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP28) taking place in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from Nov 30 to Dec 12, the agreement to expedite actions against the climate crisis despite previous disagreements sets a positive tone for negotiations and could significantly contribute to its success.

It is imperative to acknowledge that the climate crisis is now an undeniable reality, transcending mere scientific models. That is why, despite the tumultuous international environment, major powers have continued dialogue on climate-related issues and it has become an indispensable priority for world leaders.

At the heart of international relations lie national interests. The willingness of nations to set aside past grievances, bridge religious and cultural differences and development needs, to cooperate on the climate crisis underscores its pressing reality.

According to a 2021 World Economic Forum report, if the climate crisis continues unchecked, the global average temperature could rise by 3.2 Celsius by 2050, resulting in an approximate 18 percent loss to global GDP, equivalent to roughly $23 trillion.

In contrast, effective implementation of the Paris Agreement, limiting global temperature rise to below 2 C, would result in less than 4.2 percent in economic losses to global GDP. Asia is anticipated to bear the brunt of the impact, with the region’s GDP falling by 5.5 percent, even within the 2 C scenario.

However, these numbers only scratch the surface, encompassing extreme weather events, climate disasters, food scarcity, flooding from rising sea levels, and population displacement.

More profound losses, such as the extinction of numerous species, impacts on human health, exacerbated poverty, and inequality leading to social upheavals, are incalculable.

Forum report, if the climate crisis continues unchecked, the global average temperature could rise by 3.2 Celsius by 2050, resulting in an approximate 18 percent loss to global

GDP, equivalent to

roughly $23 trillion.

The US and China are not immune to these consequences. In 2022, the US incurred losses exceeding $176 billion due to weather and climate disasters. Research from Tsinghua University’s Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy reveals China’s faster temperature increase compared to the global average over the past 70 years.

The country experiences an average annual economic loss of approximately $50 billion due to climaterelated disasters, roughly equivalent to 0.4 percent of the nation’s GDP. Although 0.4 percent may seem trivial compared to China’s past doubledigit GDP growth rates, the impact of climate change is not linear. Temperatures surpassing critical points could lead to a scenario of an 18 percent global GDP loss by 2050, or worse.

Contemporary Chinese citizens have not seen significant nationwide economic downturns. In recent years of economic slowdown, many businesses and individuals have felt the chill though. If the climate crisis remains inadequately addressed, far more adverse outcomes could follow, impacting those born from the 1970s to 2000s during their later years or even in their prime.

The climate crisis fundamentally represents a tragedy of the commons. To draw an analogy, we are all “shepherds” tending to the Earth’s land. In times of abundant grass and water, if experts predict that overgrazing might deplete resources in 100 years, a shepherd focused solely on selfinterest might ignore the warning. Shepherds who are concerned about their descendants would persuade others to limit herd expansions while clandestinely growing their own.

However, when the prophecy becomes a reality — as pastures begin deteriorating and some herds suffer from malnutrition — even the self-centered shepherds will start reducing livestock size based on costbenefit calculation. Moreover, influential shepherds will aim to persuade others to collectively mitigate risks. Younger shepherds, facing potential starvation without inheriting elders’ pastures, would vehemently voice concerns. As such, participating in collective action to address the climate crisis is no longer purely altruistic but a rational choice.

As the world’s largest economies and top emitters of greenhouse gases, the China-US leaders’ meeting and the Sunnylands statement inject confidence and vitality into global climate cooperation at a crucial historical juncture. This reinforces our belief in the power of “rationality” and our faith in the international community to make informed choices in tackling the climate crisis.