China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Move forward on Xi’s remark

-

The General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Xi Jinping has said: “Making empty talk is harmful to the nation, while doing practical jobs can help it thrive”. This is not only a sign that the Party is determined to change its working and talking style, but also a serious reflection on history that will lead to China’s rejuvenati­on, says an article on eastday.com. Excerpts:

Xi’s remark can be traced back to Deng Xiaoping, who first used it while addressing local leaders in Hubei province on his inspection tour of South China in 1992. Deng’s speeches made on the southern tour has opened compatriot­s’ mind and served as the driving force of China’s reform and opening-up, and the country’s fast developmen­t.

Now that Xi has used it, it is a clear signal that the new leadership is committed to continuing the reform and opening-up, and it is in conformity with the road explored by former leaders.

The word “empty talk” is a reference to “talking without action”, which famous scholar Gu Yanwu of the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) summed up and said was misleading for a state’s fortune.

Phrase mongering used to be popular among feudal social and government elites during the Three Kingdoms (AD 220-280), Jin Dynasty (AD 265-420), and Southern and Northern Dynasties (AD 420-581), a period of disunity, instabilit­y and warfare in China. Descendant­s even blamed it for the collapse of the Jin Dynasty (AD 265-420).

Even earlier, in ancient China, there was a popular tradition of debating such as the Contention of a Hundred Schools of Thoughts during the Spring and Autumn Period (770-476 BC) and the Warring States Period (475-221 BC).

Therefore, discussing thoughts and ideas gradually became not only a way of academic exchange, but also a style of functionin­g for elites, who perceived speculativ­e debating as a way to achieve their goals.

Elites at that time indulged in debating, drinking, playing music and cynicism, turning a blind eye to practical solutions to social problems. This actually sowed the seeds for the chaos that was to follow later.

The fact of “empty talk is harmful to country” can be interprete­d as a historical phenomenon. Emperor Li Shimin of the Tang Dynasty (AD 618-907) pushed for the compilatio­n of the history of the Jin Dynasty (AD 265-420), because most importantl­y he wanted to learn how “empty talk” led to the Jin Dynasty’s collapse.

Although a conclusion has not been reached on whether “empty talk” is alone to blame for social decay and failure, it should certainly not be part of social attitude.

Since China faces an important historic period that offers great opportunit­ies and constitute­s serious challenges as well, we should not waste time on “empty talk”. The reality, however, is the opposite in the country.

Given the amount of officials’ speeches at conference­s, and the highlighti­ng of their major principles on TV screens and in newspapers, we have to confess that “empty talk” has already caused harm. What we need more than ever now is practical work.

Xi’s remark conveys two basic meanings. One is that we should take the right direction for reform and developmen­t, make serious efforts to achieve our goals and avoid meaningles­s arguments. The other is that we should change our political culture from “empty talk” to practical work and try to help the people overcome their real problems. Only in this way, can we achieve new things under the new leadership and realize the great rejuvenati­on of the Chinese nation.

The opinions expressed on this page do not necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily US Edition.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States