China Daily Global Edition (USA)
Future hangs in the balance The US president should persuade Japan’s right-wingers of the error of their ways during his trip to the region to ensure stability
After undergoing nearly seven decades of development since the end ofWorldWar II, Asia has already taken on a newlook, witnessing not only the rise of a group of industrialized countries and regions during the latter part of the 20th century, but also the emergence of a number of economies that have grown to be the engine of global economic growth in the newcentury.
However, Asia’s development is still unbalanced.
First, Asia’s political cooperation is out of step with its economic dynamism. Political trust, particularly in East Asia, is still severely lacking. The actions and comments of Japanese right-wingers, who go so far as to complain of injustice when it comes to the Tokyo Trials and try to strengthen the country’s control of territory it annexed illegally during its imperialist past, have undoubtedly sown the seeds of deep mistrust among East Asian countries.
Second, in the context of the strained relations between some countries in the region, someWestern media have been hyping speculation that the Asian economy might slow further. It is true economies in East Asia have recently experienced moderate or mediumspeed growth after years of highspeed expansion. But this tendency is in line with the lawof development, and also is connected to the fatigued global economy. Even so, the development speed of Asia’s emerging economies still far exceeds that ofWestern developed countries, and their momentum is increasingly reshaping the global landscape.
Because of the existence of various rifts and the lack of mutual trust, the region is in desperate need of candid dialogue. The trust deficit in Asia has affected the progress of regional economic cooperation, but at the same time it also suggests that there is great potential for further economic, investment and trade cooperation in the region, including the construction of regional free trade areas.
Asia needs to accumulate constructive positive energy, give full play to the spirit of countries being in the same boat, and effectively alleviate regional tensions to change the negative factors into positive elements. Moreover, Asia should oppose any shortsighted actions to set up small cliques.
Currently in Asia, there are serious differences between those countries adhering to unity and cooperation to benefit all and those trying to form cliques and factions to benefit themselves. It is Japan that is leading such divisiveness, as it has tried to piece together an Asian version ofNATO, and antagonized its neighbors by clinging obstinately to its denial of historical facts and even embarked along the road of glorifying aggression.
Any responsible power must go all out to contribute to regional peace and stability based on human morality and justice. As a great power with tremendous economic and military presence in the region, how the United States sets out its AsiaPacific position will make all the difference to Asia’s stability and development. WhetherWashington will offer constructive cooperation to Asian countries’ efforts to enhance mutual trust and erase the doubts of its intentions has a direct bearing on regional peace, as well as the US’ own strategic interests.
Thus the eyes of the world are focused on US President Barack Obama’s four-nation trip to Asia that began in Japan onWednesday.
If the US can aim high and think big and cooperate sincerely with countries in the region to establish a common security and trust mechanism that is suitable to the characteristics of the Asia-Pacific region, it will surely receive a share of Asia’s peace dividend and be genuinely welcomed among Asian countries.
However, if the US is unwilling or unable to contribute to Asia-Pacific stability, and instead takes sides in the region’s various historical and sovereignty disputes, it will be hard for the country to become the kind of responsible power that can benefit Asia. If the US only looks at shortterm interests and sits watching Japan turning its military ambition into reality step by step, not only will the troublemaker’s interests be ultimately damaged, but also those of the US.
History has repeatedly shown us that a country that employs a policy of appeasement will eventually shoot itself in the foot. The author is a professor and associate dean of the Institute of International Studies, Fudan University.