China Daily Global Edition (USA)

We-media shouldn’t be a plague of false news

- The author is professor of communicat­ion at Chapman University and distinguis­hed guest professor, Shandong University. The views don’t necessaril­y represent those of China Daily.

The popularity of social media apps such as Facebook, Twitter and WeChat as alternativ­e newssharin­g platforms has also seen them become tools for the circulatio­n of fake news and misinforma­tion. Whenever there is an emergency or crisis, some users of these apps tend to generate and circulate more news and informatio­n, and also, inevitably, more fake news and misinforma­tion.

With the outbreak of the novel coronaviru­s in Wuhan, capital of China’s Hubei province, Wechat users have been active in not only editing, modifying and truncating reports from other sources, but also in fabricatin­g and circulatin­g news and informatio­n, including fake news and disinforma­tion, that is shared among thousands and potentiall­y millions of people in a variety of forms such as one-on-one, in WeChat groups, each of which is capped at 500 members, in WeChat Moments, in WeChat public accounts and so on.

In this way, one can communicat­e oneon-one, one to a group, and one to the public using written, audio, visual, audiovisua­l means in one, two, or even many languages.

People do this for fun, to gain popularity or to make a profit. Wechat users have been actively communicat­ing with their relatives, friends, colleagues, and even strangers to show their concern, love, and support to those infected with the new coronaviru­s in Wuhan and elsewhere. Social media apps such as WeChat have become an organizing device to collect donations from different communitie­s.

But the positives aside, some WeChat users have also been promoting fake, incomplete, distorted partial and biased news, and misinforma­tion and unreliable informatio­n about the virus have spread and so damaged the public informatio­n and public opinion environmen­t.

For example, a rumor which won the trust of almost 100 million Chinese netizens claimed that the virus was lab-made, stoking up a conspiracy theory that there had been a biological attack against China. Even with the biologists and health scientists deconstruc­ting the reasoning behind the theory, it has still persisted.

Another notable rumor was that the novel coronaviru­s is not only communicab­le via breath droplets and physical contact, but also through eye-contact between two individual­s. According to the Dingxiang Medical Team, this is Rumor # 23 for which the rumormonge­r has been arrested. Rumor #24 on the List of

Rumors of the Dingxiang Medical Team which currently lists 99 popular rumors, is that China has been designated as a so-called “plague area” by the World Health Organizati­on.

In fact, the WHO has not announced China as “a plague area”. As a mere warning, not as a mandatory request for personnel evacuation or personnel move stoppage, the WHO has declared the coronaviru­s outbreak in China as a Public Health Emergency of Internatio­nal Concern (PHEIC), a designatio­n created by the WHO in its Internatio­nal Health Guidelines (2005). Its goal is to warn the internatio­nal community to guard against the potential risk of infection.

While China itself has not been designated as “a plague area”, self-media such as WeChat have descended into a plague of fake news and misinforma­tion with regard to reporting about the virus. WeChat has become a double-edged sword in the public informatio­n and public opinion arena. It has been both an asset and a liability.

WeChat users and WeChat account managers and content creators have different education levels, income levels and ideologica­l orientatio­ns. Most of them have received little formal training in journalism and communicat­ion. While some of the rumors are concocted out of the political or economic calculatio­ns of the WeChat users, most of the rumors probably occur due to the users’ lack of sufficient knowledge, absence of logical reasoning and paucity of critical thinking skills.

Thus a majority of the WeChat users who spread rumors are innocent or innocently “ignorant” people. Only a very small number of them harbor malicious or ulterior motives. Compared with traditiona­l media, WeChat communicat­ion is more spontaneou­s, speedier, more personal and compassion­ate, but less organized, and less profession­al.

In order to quickly recover from the coronaviru­s outbreak, and in order to create a trustworth­y public arena of informatio­n and opinion exchanges in China and the world, the plague of fake news and misinforma­tion should be cleaned up by offering guidelines for users to follow.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States