China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Ban on Xinjiang cotton called anti-China ploy

Peace activists say US action on Uygur rights pretext aimed at destabiliz­ation

- By LIA ZHU in San Francisco liazhu@chinadaily­usa.com

The United States’ ban on Xinjiang-grown cotton over allegation­s of “forced labor” is aimed at destabiliz­ing China, said some peace activists who also accuse the US government of failing to address its own human rights violations.

The administra­tion of then-US president Donald Trump imposed an import ban on all cotton products from the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region early this year over allegation­s that they are made with the forced labor of Uygur Muslims, which has been repeatedly denied by China.

“Forced labor, which means ‘coercion to work through the use of violence or intimidati­on’, has never been proved,” said Julie Tang, co-founder of Pivot to Peace, an organizati­on dedicated to advocating US-China peace. “Even BBC, the media outlet that promulgate­s this ‘forced labor’ concept, admits it doesn’t have the evidence.

“They show some empty buildings, some pictures of Uygurs traveling and working in factories. This speculativ­e and non-corroborat­ed informatio­n is not enough to sustain the forced labor allegation­s if tried in a law court,” said Tang, a retired Superior Court judge in San Francisco.

She said that 70 percent of the cotton in Xinjiang, which is in Northwest China, is picked by machines, and that the cotton industry provides “one of the most successful poverty-alleviatio­n efforts in China — the same efforts were repeated throughout China to alleviate 800 million people from poverty”.

However, the so-called forced labor allegation­s have created an emotional reaction in the West against China to justify a massive call for a boycott against Xinjiang cotton, said Tang. The actions of Western countries have thrown the Chinese textile industry into turmoil and hurt the Uygurs, the very people they claim to protect.

Sameena Rahman, a Los Angelesbas­ed peace activist, said that, in contrast to the “mechanized cottonpick­ing” in Xinjiang, prisoners in the Angola Prison in Louisiana were compelled to handpick cotton and paid 4 cents an hour in 2016.

Systemic discrimina­tion

“If anything, industries using and exploiting prison labor with incredibly low wages in the US should be the ones being boycotted,” she said.

The US has been criticized for failing to comply with internatio­nal human rights obligation­s, by committing systemic discrimina­tion and racial bias. It has the highest child-poverty rate among developed countries, and the highest criminal incarcerat­ion rate in the world.

“The US has a poor record on human rights violations — think Black Lives Matter, anti-Asian violence, Indian genocides, incarcerat­ion of Japanese Americans during World War II, and even less of a human rights record on Muslims,” said Tang.

“We have killed hundreds of thousands of Muslims after 9/11 and imprisoned hundreds of Muslims in Guantanamo. There, the Muslims are subjected to a separate system of justice that makes it easier for the US to utilize tactics, such as torture, because the US laws do not apply to prisons outside of the US mainland.”

Rahman, who is a Muslim, said her community has faced increased racial profiling, suspicion, verbal assault and massive surveillan­ce since the Sept 11, 2001, attacks.

That the treatment of Uygurs in Xinjiang gets more attention than the treatment of American Muslims in the US is partly due to the “concerted effort” by the “corporate mainstream media” in Western countries without proper investigat­ion into the credibilit­y of sources, said Rahman.

It’s part of the “US propaganda campaign to interfere in Xinjiang to destabiliz­e China”, she said.

Tang warned that the US is creating “a dangerous confrontat­ion with China. China’s leadership enjoys favorable support from 90 percent of its people. The efforts to destabiliz­e China through Xinjiang so far have only been relegated to public relations ploys that do nothing to hurt China’s internal social structures,” she said.

Just like “Iraq’s weapons of mass destructio­n” and “Kuwait’s incubator babies”, which helped “manufactur­e consent from the public for the US to go to war with Iraq in 2003”, “Xinjiang cotton” is now used to “prime the US public in the direction of war with China”, Tang said.

“Is the US trying to help or protect the Muslims? Or is Xinjiang the catalyst to contain China’s economic progress?” she said. “I don’t think the American people want the US to exhaust our resources to contain China, if they knew the price ordinary citizens have to pay for US hegemony.”

I don’t think the American people want the US to exhaust our resources to contain China, if they knew the price ordinary citizens have to pay for US hegemony.”

Julie Tang, co-founder of Pivot to Peace

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States