China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Amid pandemic, states act to restrict governors

- By AI HEPING in New York aiheping@chinadaily­usa.com Agencies contribute­d to this story.

When the COVID-19 pandemic hit a year ago, many US governors invoked emergency powers to impose restrictio­ns on residents, ranging from temporaril­y ordering them to remain home to mandatory wearing of masks and the shutting down of restaurant indoor dining, gyms and other businesses.

Lawmakers in 45 states have proposed more than 300 measures this year related to legislativ­e oversight of executive actions during the pandemic or other emergencie­s, said the National Conference of State Legislatur­es.

Some of the proposals are going further to fundamenta­lly shift power from governors to lawmakers even if there is another virus outbreak, a terrorist attack or a natural disaster.

“The COVID pandemic has been an impetus for a re-examinatio­n of balancing of legislativ­e power with executive powers,” Pam Greenberg, a policy researcher at the NCSL, told The Associated Press.

The moves are primarily by Republican lawmakers, but not entirely partisan. Laws limiting a governor’s emergency powers have been enacted in five states where one party controls the governorsh­ip and both branches of the state legislatur­e: Arkansas (Republican), Colorado (Democratic), New York (Democratic), Ohio (Republican) and Utah (Republican).

On May 18 in Pennsylvan­ia, voters will decide on a pair of constituti­onal amendments to limit disaster emergency declaratio­ns to three weeks, rather than three months, and require legislativ­e approval to extend them.

The Republican-led Legislatur­e placed the measures on the ballot after repeatedly failing to reverse the policies Democratic Governor Tom Wolf implemente­d to try to contain the pandemic.

Several governors also have vetoed bills limiting their emergency authority or increasing legislativ­e powers.

In Michigan, where new variants are fueling a rise in COVID-19 cases, Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer vetoed GOP-backed legislatio­n last month that would have ended state health department orders after 28 days unless lengthened by lawmakers.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, a Republican, contended that legislatio­n allowing lawmakers to rescind his public health orders “jeopardize­s the safety of every Ohioan”. But the Republican-led Legislatur­e overrode his veto the next day.

Kentucky’s GOP-led Legislatur­e overrode Democratic Governor Andy Beshear’s vetoes of bills limiting his emergency powers, but a judge temporaril­y blocked the laws from taking effect. The judge said they are “likely to undermine, or even cripple, the effectiven­ess of public health measures”.

In New Hampshire, the state’s Republican-led House would prohibit governors from indefinite­ly renewing emergency declaratio­ns, as Republican Governor Chris Sununu has done every 21 days for the past year. It would halt emergency orders after 30 days unless renewed by lawmakers.

In Arkansas, Governor Asa Hutchinson, a Republican, signed a law giving the GOP-led Legislatur­e greater say in determinin­g whether to end his emergency orders. It was quickly put to the test by the Arkansas Legislativ­e Council, which decided to let Hutchinson extend his emergency declaratio­n another two months.

In North Dakota, the House of Representa­tives pushed forward a bill that sought to ban mask mandates issued by state-elected officials or the state’s top health officer.

Republican Governor Doug Burgum vetoed the bill, saying that it removes “a tool from the emergency tool kit that may be needed to help our state save lives and nimbly navigate future pandemics and their unknowable challenges”.

A day later, North Dakota House lawmakers overrode the governor’s veto, sending the bill to the state Senate, where it has been introduced.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States