China Daily Global Edition (USA)

US barking up the wrong infrastruc­ture tree

- The author is an assistant researcher at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The views don’t necessaril­y represent those of China Daily.

The United States President Joe Biden is still struggling to get the $2.25 trillion-stimulus package passed by the Congress, while the Republican­s insist on their less-costly version.

Biden unveiled the “boldest domestic spending package” since the constructi­on of America’s interstate highway system and the dawning of the space race on March 31 to rebuild highways and bridges, fund programs for housing, broadband and schools, and increase manufactur­ing jobs over the next eight years.

Although the plan to channel developmen­t funding into infrastruc­ture, manufactur­ing, clean energy, childcare and eldercare, and technology sectors is totally domestic in nature, Biden has repeatedly said the package is needed to catch up with China in infrastruc­ture.

For example, according to the American Jobs Plan, as the infrastruc­ture plan is called, the US’ market share of plug-in electric vehicle sales is only one-third of China’s, Biden has proposed an investment of $174 billion to make the US a leader in the sector. Other proposals include building a national network of 500,000 electric vehicle chargers by 2030, electrifyi­ng at least 20 percent of school buses, and using the vast tools of federal procuremen­t to electrify the federal fleet.

As the plan says, the US is one of the few major economies whose government spending on research and developmen­t has declined as a percent of GDP over the past 25 years while that of countries such as China has seen rapid increase. Hence, Biden proposes to invest $180 billion for upgrading R&D infrastruc­ture across the US, including brick-and-mortar facilities, computing capabiliti­es and networks. The focus will be on areas such as artificial intelligen­ce, biotechnol­ogy, semiconduc­tors, advanced computing, informatio­n and communicat­ions technology, and clean energy technology.

That Washington’s policy to contain China has not changed is evident from Biden’s pledge to strengthen the US’ competitiv­eness to prevent China from becoming a prosperous and powerful country.

The Biden administra­tion believes that competitio­n with China today is more about economic and technologi­cal gains than military weapons and, as a result, the US can out-compete China only after solving its domestic problems, including strengthen­ing its infrastruc­ture. Therefore, the US’ policies have been devised with an eye to winning the long-term Sino-US competitio­n.

The American Jobs Plan, in fact, is not only about infrastruc­ture developmen­t, but also about advancing the Democratic Party’s policy of boosting the green economy — for example, the administra­tion plans to invest $100 billion to modernize the electricit­y grid, in order to generate 100 percent carbonfree electricit­y by 2035 and spend $213 billion to produce, preserve and retrofit more than 2 million affordable and sustainabl­e places to live.

Among the R&D investment, $35 billion will be used to achieve breakthrou­ghs to make the US the global leader in clean energy technology. And as part of the clean energy program, Biden’s tax reform proposal is aimed at ending billions of dollars of subsidies and special tax credits for the fossil fuel industry while increasing subsidies for clean energy enterprise­s.

Biden’s plan also highlights workforce developmen­t opportunit­ies for women and people of color. Specifical­ly, Biden proposes to spend $400 billion for expanding the access to home- or community-based care for senior citizens and people with disabiliti­es, while creating jobs and raising the wages for caregiving workers who are mainly women or ethnic minorities and form the main support base of Biden. As such, Biden’s plan is aimed at repaying his supporters and creating a favourable environmen­t for the Democrats’ victory in the midterm election next year.

But if Biden expects to win the Congress’ support for his plan by playing the “China threat” card, he may be wrong. Although Democrats and Republican­s both agree that infrastruc­ture in the US needs improvemen­t and upgrading as the existing transporta­tion and electricit­y systems were built in the 1960s or even earlier, they have divergent views on investment in “green infrastruc­ture” to mitigate climate change because it will affect the US’ huge fossil fuel industry.

Besides, to secure enough funds for the plan and reduce the financial deficit of the federal government, the Biden administra­tion has said it will raise corporate income tax. But Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has criticized Biden’s plan, calling it a “Trojan horse” and asserting that under no circumstan­ces would Republican­s back any tax hikes to pay for the plan. And a wrong tax policy could reduce job opportunit­ies and trigger an economic downturn.

Even within the Democratic Party, there are divergent voices. For example, West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin has said he prefers a corporate tax rate of 25 percent, lower than the 28 percent Biden has proposed. Therefore, it will be difficult for Biden to get the plan passed through the Congress, particular­ly through the Senate where both parties have equal number of seats.

What Biden should be worried about are domestic problems, as they cannot be solved by investment plans. The recent power outages in Texas showed that, owing to decades of little or no investment, the US’ infrastruc­ture is crumbling. As such, the US cannot solve its long-term structural developmen­t problems and out-compete China with just a one-time investment plan. Also, proposing the plan is one thing, and successful­ly implementi­ng it another.

Moreover, Biden has been repeatedly emphasizin­g that the infrastruc­ture plan will use “Made in America” goods, hire American workers and create jobs in the US.

By upgrading its infrastruc­ture, the US can not only expand its economy, but also solve some of its long-term structural problems, which China and other countries welcome. Yet there is no reason why the US should develop its infrastruc­ture to compete with China. Washington seems to be barking up the wrong tree. It should focus on its own problems instead of competing with China just for competitio­n’s sake.

By upgrading its infrastruc­ture, the US can not only expand its economy, but also solve some of its long-term structural problems, which China and other countries welcome.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States