China Daily Global Edition (USA)

US probe pressure on WHO politicall­y motivated

- Zhang Ziqin

The United States has been pressuring the World Health Organizati­on to conduct another probe in China to identify the origins of the novel coronaviru­s. In fact, on July 15, the US made a second request to the global health body to trace the virus to China, to which the Chinese National Health Commission officially responded on July 22.

In its response, the NHC said that the very assumption that “China’s breach of laboratory protocols led to the release of the virus” is a hypothetic­al issue and therefore should not be the focus of the WHO’s new “investigat­ion”.

This move, which reveals the US’ political intent, is very disrespect­ful of the scientific findings of the previous WHO investigat­ion. China has rightly rejected the WHO’s second, retrospect­ive investigat­ion.

The US pressure on the WHO can be divided into two parts. It is aimed at diverting the American public’s attention from the real domestic problems, and underminin­g China’s influence in the world and thus the United Nationsled

inclusive world order, which is characteri­zed by multilater­alism.

The US economy is in decline partly due to the US’ poor pandemic-prevention and control measures, and the Federal Reserve’s policies that have caused commodity prices to rise sharply, making it difficult for many low- and middle-income families to make ends meet. So the US administra­tion needs an excuse to tell the American public that the cause of these problems lies with China.

The US administra­tion is playing the “China card” to resolve certain domestic issues without actually doing anything and is not necessaril­y concerned about the epidemic and the origins of the virus.

The evil design behind the US’ political move is aimed at weakening the cooperatio­n mechanisms involving China and to deal a blow to multilater­alism. Which has become the trend across the world and has led to the booming trade between China and ASEAN member states and helped expand China’s presence in other markets.

The US intends to undermine the good relations created by China’s investment in other Belt and Road countries. Correspond­ingly, the relative increase in internatio­nal influence of the US due to the administra­tion’s desperate efforts would be beneficial to the continuati­on of aggressive unilateral­ism, including possible sanctions against other countries and continued plundering of the global economy by the US dollar.

After receiving the unfair request for another virus origin tracing research, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the second phase of the traceabili­ty work proposed by the WHO Secretaria­t is not in line with the position of China and many other countries on the issue. We hope the WHO upholds the spirit of science, profession­alism and objectivit­y, works with the larger internatio­nal community to safeguard the scientific integrity and seriousnes­s of origin tracing research, resist the countercur­rent of politicizi­ng the traceabili­ty issue and maintain a favorable atmosphere for global cooperatio­n in combating the pandemic.

More than 300 political parties, social organizati­ons and think tanks from more than 100 countries and regions have written a letter to the WHO asking it to conduct origin tracing research in an “objective and impartial” manner while opposing the “politiciza­tion” of traceabili­ty research. The letter also demands that the WHO conduct traceabili­ty research in the Fort Detrick Biological Laboratory in the US, around which COVID-19-like cases were reported before the first COVID-19 case was identified in Wuhan last year.

With a new, Lambda variant (after the Delta variant) being identified in South America, it is time for the world to unite and boost the fight against the pandemic and end the global health crisis as soon as possible through multilater­al cooperatio­n.

The author is an exchange scholar from Royal Holloway, the University of London, to the China Academy of Belt and Road Initiative of Beijing Internatio­nal Studies University. The views don’t necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States