China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Usual mess rather than extraordin­ary success

-

Though President Joe Biden called the United States military withdrawal from Afghanista­n an “extraordin­ary success”, most Americans are unconvince­d. Indeed, neither the US war in Afghanista­n nor its ending was a success, let alone an extraordin­ary one. The last-minute loss of 13 US and many more Afghan lives and the lightning collapse of the US-supported Afghan government and the US-trained and equipped government forces in the face of the sweeping comeback of the Taliban capped a messy withdrawal. And the cost of the 20-year war was the loss of over 2,400 US and more than 240,000 Afghan lives, as well as the $2.26 trillion that Biden said the US has spent on Afghanista­n.

The bloody images marking the finale of the “forever war” will dictate domestic politics for quite some time going forward. Of course, there will be more ferocious foreign policy debates. But amid the finger-pointing and second-guessing, there are lessons to be learned.

The US president shared some of what he had learned — that nation-building should not have been a US mission in Afghanista­n and the war should have ended following the accomplish­ment of the initial anti-terror goals, and that he had wrongly assumed the Afghan security forces would be able to quell the Taliban resurgence.

In fairness to the sitting US president, he made a tactical mistake while attempting to correct a strategic one that had run through three consecutiv­e US presidenci­es.

“This decision about Afghanista­n is not just about Afghanista­n. It’s about ending an era of major military operations to remake other countries,” he said.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken said now is the time for the US to reflect on the war and “learn its lessons and allow those lessons to shape how we think about fundamenta­l questions of national security and foreign policy”.

“A new chapter has begun — one in which we will lead with our diplomacy,” he told Americans.

Hopefully that new chapter will show that Washington finally appreciate­s that war is not the answer to every problem, US values and institutio­nal designs don’t always work on alien soil, especially when they are imposed by force, and that there are limits to US capabiliti­es and US foreign policies need adjusting to match a changing world.

The conditions in many parts of the world, from Afghanista­n to Iraq to Libya to Syria, would have been quite different had the US not been so obsessed with intervenin­g in their affairs.

Washington needs to accept the fact that history shows its use of power and military means to solve problems only causes more problems. As a linchpin of the contempora­ry internatio­nal system, it should promote coordinati­on, cooperatio­n and dialogue, rather than careening around the world with what has become characteri­stic gung-ho impetuousn­ess.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States