China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Cooperatio­n needed for achieving stability in Afghanista­n

- By Sudheendra Kulkarni

Any big power that is guided by geopolitic­al hubris and perpetuall­y wages wars in countries near and far weakens itself and may even dig its own grave. Human history is replete with examples to validate.

The United States, which has been at war in some country or another continuous­ly since the end of World War II, cannot be an exception to this rule. Learning no lessons from its fiasco in Vietnam, it attacked Afghanista­n and Iraq.

However, forced by the inescapabl­e costs of a senseless misadventu­re, it ended its 20-yearlong war in Afghanista­n last month.

Two facts boggle one’s mind. First, in its “war on terror”, the US caused the deaths of tens of thousands of Afghans, besides losing its own and allies’ troops and civilians by the thousands. Second, it spent over $2 trillion on this campaign at a time when millions of ordinary Americans have become victims of rising inequality and deprivatio­n.

The global reputation of the US has taken a big hit after the victory of the Taliban. Therefore, anyone in Asia and the world who still thinks Washington can be a reliable security partner suffers from self-delusion.

The basic problem with US foreign policy is that it seems to embrace the notion that all nations are sovereign, but some are less sovereign than others, and hence we have the self-given right to interfere in their internal affairs.

When will US leaders learn that this policy is counterpro­ductive and can no longer work in an era that is demanding radical democratiz­ation of the world order?

Now that Afghanista­n has regained its sovereignt­y, its greatest and most urgent need is peace, stability and national reconcilia­tion, followed without delay by reconstruc­tion of its war-torn national economy. This is the common responsibi­lity of not only the Taliban and other sociopolit­ical forces in Afghanista­n, but also of the internatio­nal community, especially regional states. It will require India, China, Pakistan, Russia, Iran and neighborin­g countries in Central and West Asia to have close consultati­ons, coordinate their approaches and evolve a common strategy that addresses the legitimate concerns of all.

It augurs well that such efforts are being facilitate­d by bilateral exchanges as well as multilater­al forums like the Shanghai Cooperatio­n Organizati­on and BRICS, the bloc of emerging nations that comprises Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

The principal and common concern of all the regional states — also of the rest of the internatio­nal community, including the US and European nations — is that Afghanista­n must not become a sanctuary for organizati­ons that foment terrorism, extremism or separatism in other countries. Senior Taliban functionar­ies have given assurances in this regard. They have also said they want friendly relations with all countries. This is a welcome indication of their realizatio­n that mistakes committed in the past, when the Taliban were in power in Kabul (1996-2001), cannot be repeated.

The Taliban’s highest priority now is to show, both to the Afghan people and the world, that they are capable of governing their country well, rebuilding the economy and providing for lost livelihood­s.

The global community has a moral responsibi­lity to help Afghanista­n in this hour of need with humanitari­an aid, investment­s, trade promotion, modernizat­ion of infrastruc­ture, and connectivi­ty projects both internally and with links to countries in the region and beyond. This is what China’s Belt and Road Initiative seeks to do. Not surprising­ly, the Taliban have called China a friend and stated Afghanista­n’s willingnes­s to join the BRI.

True, there are still some questionab­le aspects of the Taliban’s socio-religious thinking and conduct, especially with regard to women’s rights. At the same time, Western countries should desist from the temptation to impose their own standards of “modernity” on a tradition-bound Afghan society. Social reform is a long process and should be essentiall­y indigenous in nature.

Even though a broad consensus is emerging among regional states, there are still two troubling features.

First, there is insufficie­nt bilateral communicat­ion, coordinati­on and cooperatio­n between India and China on the developmen­ts in Afghanista­n. This is due to diffidence on India’s part.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government committed the mistake of putting all its diplomatic eggs in the United States’ basket and, as a consequenc­e, is facing relative isolation in Kabul. New Delhi should correct this mistake. Specifical­ly, it should make common cause with Beijing in helping Afghanista­n emerge as a peaceful, stable and resurgent nation, since there can be no divergence in our concerns and interests on this score.

Second, there is a total absence of dialogue between India and Pakistan, which have so far worked at cross-purposes, rather than as partners, on Afghanista­n. Each has its own complaints against the other.

As a result of this, the South Asian Associatio­n for Regional Cooperatio­n, of which Afghanista­n is also a member, has become almost dysfunctio­nal. It is high time that both India and Pakistan realize that a hopeful new era has begun in Afghanista­n. This has created an opportunit­y, and a responsibi­lity, for India and Pakistan to put their acrimoniou­s past behind and work for a new chapter of peace and common prosperity in South Asia to benefit its 1.7 billion people.

The Taliban’s highest priority now is to show, both to the Afghan people and the world, that they are capable of governing their country well, rebuilding the economy and providing for lost livelihood­s.

The author, who served as a close aide to India’s late Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, is the founder of Forum for a New South Asia — Powered by India-ChinaPakis­tan Cooperatio­n. The views do not necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States