China Daily Global Edition (USA)

UK says it wants to work with China. Really?

-

The UK government on Wednesday ordered a Chinese-owned company to divest most of its stake in the United Kingdom’s biggest semiconduc­tor maker. This is not only a heavy blow to a legally operating Chinese company, but also a fresh reminder of the harsh wintry global climate for Chinese companies’ overseas operations.

The order has the effect of requiring Nexperia BV to sell at least 86 percent of its stake in Nexperia Newport Limited, formerly Newport Wafer Fab, within a specified period and by following a specified process, the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said in a statement.

The Netherland­s-based Nexperia, which is owned by Chinese smartphone maker Wingtech, acquired an additional 86 percent of the share capital of Newport Wafer Fab on July 5 last year, taking its shareholdi­ng to 100 percent, which constitute­d a trigger event under the UK’s National Security and Investment Act, which came into force on Wednesday.

The divestment order, which Nexperia has vowed to appeal, was allegedly based on what British Business Secretary Grant Shapps called a “detailed national security assessment”. That assessment, like the UK’s 2020 ban on Chinese telecommun­ications company Huawei’s involvemen­t in the country’s 5G broadband network, concluded that activities at the site had the potential “to undermine UK capabiliti­es” and prevent UK technologi­cal expertise and know-how with links to the site being engaged in future projects relevant to national security.

As in many other similar cases targeting technology-related Chinese investment­s in Western countries, the “national security” argument was based almost entirely on an assumption of guilt. Of course this is not fair to any company that is operating in strict accordance with law. But what is happening to Chinese overseas investment lately in Western countries has clearly deviated far from the set rules and norms of normally functionin­g market economies.

The divestment order for Nexperia is only one more footnote to the changing global geopolitic­al climate that appears to be increasing­ly unwelcomin­g of Chinese investment, particular­ly in technology companies. Nexperia is only the latest victim of the United States-led Western initiative to frustrate, if not throttle, Chinese pursuit of technologi­cal advancemen­t, and it won’t be the last. The US Commerce Department is reportedly set to put more Chinese technology companies on its Entity List. US allies are following its lead with stricter “national security” scrutiny of Chinese investment­s and acquisitio­ns.

As is true in the Nexperia case, where a Chineseown­ed company based in the Netherland­s had increased its stakes in a UK company, most of today’s cutting-edge technologi­es and their applicatio­n are the fruits of global expertise and cooperatio­n, and depend on them. The Western countries’ initiative to slam their doors shut to Chinese companies will inevitably hurt themselves as it will serve to restrict their access to China’s massive market, which has proven to be instrument­al to the populariza­tion and rapid progress of many applied technologi­es.

Hyping up disinforma­tion about a security threat and then using it to hobble Chinese companies has become a go-to tool of the US, as a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoma­n said. The UK should act responsibl­y and not just be a poodle yapping for attention at the heels of Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States