China Daily Global Edition (USA)

Hard and soft connection­s

China should continue to develop cross-border economic corridors, advance the institutio­nal developmen­t of the BRI and improve the all-around support systems

- The author is a professor and associate dean of Department of Economics at Peking University. The author contribute­d this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessaril­y reflect those of China Daily.

Over the past decade, China’s economic growth pattern has changed profoundly, from pursuing sheer quantity to balancing quantity and quality. From 2012 to 2023, its GDP more than doubled with an average annual growth of over 6 percent. Despite the complexity and volatility in the global economic environmen­t, China’s economy has been growing steadily and has become one of the main drivers of global growth.

As China seeks steady and progressiv­e growth, it is important to understand that a series of challenges may surface due to changes in the domestic and internatio­nal environmen­t, prominent contradict­ions in the economic structure and the specific requiremen­ts at a new developmen­t stage.

The 2023 Central Economic Work Conference proposed to expand high-level opening-up and consolidat­e foreign trade and investment. To deliver on this goal, building cross-border economic corridors and the Belt and Road Initiative cooperatio­n mechanism can provide new momentum, with the new developmen­t pattern serving as the guiding framework and allaround support system to ensure highqualit­y developmen­t of opening-up.

First, continue to develop cross-border economic corridors to build new value chains and supply chains.

Escalating competitio­n between China and the United States has led to increase in trade protection­ism and separatism. Against this backdrop, cross-border economic corridors should contribute to the new developmen­t pattern of dual circulatio­n, which emphasizes on synergy between domestic and overseas markets.

These corridors are, first and foremost, the key links to promote the integratio­n of domestic and global value chains and extend the regional value chains along the way. This will facilitate China’s foreign investment attraction as well as Chinese enterprise­s’ overseas developmen­t.

Building and improving regional value chains parallel to the global value chain is also important. As the global value chain reshuffles, the dual circulatio­n model with China as the hub will help leverage the strengths of China and partner countries along the corridors, broaden and deepen production capacity cooperatio­n, and strengthen the integratio­n of value chains and supply chains.

Establishi­ng a regional collaborat­ive innovation community to promote the twoway integratio­n of the innovation ecosystems in China and partner countries is also advised. This will not only enhance the resilience of China’s economic circulatio­n and high-level opening-up, but also lay the foundation for new technology progress to drive the value chains and supply chains along the corridors.

Developing cross-border economic corridors should be guided by the concept of a “community with a shared future” and supported by high-standard market systems. The key focus is to improve industry coordinati­on and layout along cross-border transporta­tion channels. By introducin­g rules and systems to facilitate trade and investment and free trade zone agreements, trade rules can be integrated, policies of countries along the corridors coordinate­d, and market and resource reallocati­on promoted, so as to drive the integratio­n and innovation of regional value chains, which is crucial for promoting the virtuous cycle for an open economy.

Second, advance the institutio­nal developmen­t of the BRI and promote the “soft connectivi­ty” of rules and standards.

On the one hand, the Belt and Road Forum for Internatio­nal Cooperatio­n should be a key platform to develop national institutio­ns that will guide high-level opening-up. This should include an optimized pattern of jointly building the Belt and Road, which will promote institutio­nalized cooperatio­n and provide more growth impetus for partner countries.

Top-level management institutio­ns should also be optimized to clarify the positionin­g and goals of the BRF, determine the priorities of capacity cooperatio­n based on the convergenc­e of interests of all parties, and guide the geographic­al layout of Belt and Road projects.

On the other hand, high-quality cooperatio­n mechanisms for jointly building the Belt and Road should be promoted based on the network of free trade. Free trade agreements reflect the willingnes­s of countries to promote free trade cooperatio­n. It is highly feasible to promote the initiative through bilateral or multilater­al institutio­nal agreements.

Agreements such as the Lancang-Mekong cooperatio­n and the Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor, along with related projects, can be incorporat­ed into the cooperatio­n framework of the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area Agreement, to facilitate regional trade.

Third, improve the all-around support systems to ensure the sustainabl­e developmen­t of high-level opening-up.

For China’s domestic support systems, it is necessary to further improve the regional and country-specific risk assessment, investment and financing systems and debt sustainabi­lity guarantee.

This includes a series of tasks. First, a cross-sector risk assessment system should be establishe­d to enable an alert mechanism for investment security and regular release of important informatio­n for specific regions and countries, so as to help enterprise­s enhance their risk awareness and capabiliti­es.

Second, more direct financing approaches should be explored, including establishi­ng and improving a diversifie­d, sustainabl­e, and inclusive “going global” investment and financing system, building a cross-border financial service network, to facilitate multi-channel financing.

Third, the debt sustainabi­lity guarantee mechanism should be improved. Based on the World Bank’s debt sustainabi­lity analysis framework, third-party financial institutio­ns and internatio­nal organizati­ons can be invited to conduct debt sustainabi­lity assessment­s on relevant projects, which can be managed according to their debt risk ratings.

In terms of the intergover­nmental cooperatio­n support mechanisms, dispute resolution systems are essential for Chinese enterprise­s to “go global”. Therefore, a sound consultati­on and communicat­ion mechanism should be establishe­d to improve bilateral and multilater­al responses, explore targeted dispute settlement mechanisms, and improve efficiency.

Internatio­nal dispute settlement mechanisms offer good examples. Multilater­al organizati­ons can be introduced to establish a dispute coordinati­on department, which will resolve commercial disputes based on the principles of fairness and justice, and equally protect the rights and interests of all parties.

Finally, enhance the capabiliti­es for systemic risk prevention and control. China and host countries should strengthen communicat­ion and coordinati­on, enhance the awareness of a security community, improve security measures and strengthen the security of trade and investment projects and personnel.

In addition, enterprise­s need to be guided to fulfill their responsibi­lities toward risk prevention and control, including enhancing risk awareness and capabiliti­es, regulating overseas business operations, establishi­ng risk prevention and control measures, so as to ensure early detection, early warning and early prevention.

 ?? ??
 ?? SONG CHEN / CHINA DAILY ??
SONG CHEN / CHINA DAILY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States