Connecticut Post (Sunday)

A change that should stay

- MIKE DALY Michael J. Daly is retired editor of the editorial page of the Connecticu­t Post. Email: Mike. daly@ hearstmedi­act. com.

Among the smart things Gov. Ned Lamont has done over the last few months — and he has done a lot of them — was making it possible for every eligible voter in the state to vote by absentee ballot in the Aug. 11 primary elections for president and a variety of state and municipal offices.

Anything that makes voting available to more people is a good thing.

By “more people” I mean registered, eligible voters.

Lamont’s executive order means a person doesn’t have to represent that they fall into one of the six existing categories that have traditiona­lly qualified a person to vote by absentee ballot: on active military duty, out of town through the entire 14- hour traditiona­l voting session, illness, a religious conflict, physical disability or, finally, working on Election Day as a poll official.

By the way, absentee voting in Connecticu­t, according to the state Office of Legislativ­e Research, dates back to 1864, when the state accommodat­ed men fighting in the Civil War by letting them vote in absentia.

In 1932, the right was expanded to those who were physically disabled, ill or out of town on Election Day. Folks, it’s 2020.

We bank, shop, communicat­e, work, research, pay our bills, participat­e in the U. S. Census, entertain ourselves with music, cat memes, movies and so on from our home computers.

What’s with the go- standin- line thing on Election Day?

Lamont’s decision on absentee ballots for the primary was rightly prompted by the current situation. We are in the middle of a pandemic. COVID- 19 is a very real, very scary prospect.

“Nobody should need to make a decision between their health and their right to vote,” the governor said in a press release that accompanie­d his executive order of last week.

“Out state has taken every responsibl­e step to this point to ensure that our residents are safe, and the next step we must take is to mitigate the risk of the spread of COVID- 19 when Connecticu­t residents cast their ballots,” he said.

Though Lamont’s action was particular­ly reasonable in this Time of Corona, there’s just no reason why more steps can’t be taken to bring the democratic process of voting into the 21st century.

Voting policies differ across the country. States are a patchwork of all- mail voting, early voting, no excuse needed absentee ballot voting, and combinatio­ns of those. Connecticu­t, according to the National Conference of State Legislatur­es, is one of only 13 states that still have no early voting and require an excuse for using an absentee ballot. It makes no sense.

In the 2016 presidenti­al election, some 61 percent of registered American voters participat­ed.

( I’m guessing that figure, which comes from the U. S. Census, doesn’t include the “millions” of illegal votes that Donald Trump complained caused his loss of the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. They were probably some of the same invisible people that Trump said swelled the size of the crowd at his inaugurati­on into the stratosphe­re.)

Sure, I’ve seen voter fraud in Bridgeport. Votes cast from the address of a long- vacant apartment building. Elderly and confused nursing home residents bamboozled into signing absentee ballot applicatio­ns and voting by absentee ballot.

People voting as a dead person whose name had not yet been purged from a voting list.

Like deflated footballs, election stunts are always going to be with us.

They are not a reason to make voting more difficult. The more people who take part in elections, the more vibrant the system will be. The more invested those people will be in the status of their communitie­s.

Lamont and the state legislatur­e should push ahead with early voting and noexcuse absentee ballot voting in Connecticu­t.

When we come out of the Time of Corona, we should be looking ahead, not preoccupie­d with going back to the way things used to be. Things are never going to be the way they used to be.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States