Connecticut Post (Sunday)

Climate change that you can smell in the air

- Hugh Bailey is editorial page editor of the Connecticu­t Post and New Haven Register. He can be reached at hbailey@hearstmedi­act.com.

“Let’s address this crisis — for our children, grandchild­ren, and future generation­s.”

Gov. Ned Lamont

Except in specific circumstan­ces — say, when you’re out camping — the state of Connecticu­t is not supposed to smell like a campfire. That’s the situation we found ourselves in late last month, with air quality alerts that lasted days. It got bad enough that the governor decided to weigh in.

“If an air quality alert in CT caused by smoke traveling cross country from western wildfires isn’t a sign that we must take climate action now at all levels of government, I don’t know what is,” Gov. Ned Lamont said in a Twitter post, adding, “Let’s address this crisis — for our children, grandchild­ren, and future generation­s.”

The worst of the smoke in Connecticu­t was apparently the result of wildfires in Canada, but huge swaths of this country have been burning for weeks as the area west of the Mississipp­i River continues yet another year of severe drought.

Lamont, though, didn’t emerge unscathed, as numerous replies to his tweet pointed out that Consaving necticut has on the table a climate change plan that it has failed thus far to enact. Known as the Transporta­tion and Climate Initiative, it’s an interstate compact that would in effect put a price on carbon pollution with a focus on transporta­tion, which accounts for an oversize share of greenhouse gas emissions.

Republican­s called it a gas tax, which is at least in the vicinity of truth, since it would increase the cost of filling up your tank. The money it raised was supposed to fund transporta­tion alternativ­es like bike paths and electric vehicles.

But given their numbers, Republican­s on their own can’t do anything other than complain. The failure to enact TCI this past session was entirely on Lamont and other Democrats, who let the get bogged down in discussion­s around budgets and taxes. In other words, they didn’t treat it at all as an emergency whose enactment should trump other concerns.

It should be clear enough that Connecticu­t can’t solve climate change on its own, and neither can a 13-state cross-border compact. In opposing TCI, skeptics pointed out how little impact it would have in the overall scheme of things, as if anything that doesn’t solve the problem isn’t worth doing.

But that’s not how emergencie­s work. In an emergency, you do everything you can, even if the individual impact is small, and combine them together to make a legitimate impact. To argue we’re not in an emergency is to say that temperatur­es reaching 116 degrees in Portland, Ore., is normal, and that flooding that killed almost 200 people last month is Germany is to be expected. Just because we haven’t seen such extremes in Connecticu­t doesn’t mean it isn’t coming.

There’s word now that Democrats may reintroduc­e TCI this fall in a special legislativ­e session, and Lamont has indicated his support. Republican­s would likely treat that as a gift, since it would allow them to run next year against the party that raised the price of gas. But they were going to make that argument anyway. The harder issue, which has always been the sticking point for action against climate change, is that thinking long term is bad politics.

You can’t be the governor of low gas prices and also act against climate change. It doesn’t work that way. Somehow or other, consumptio­n needs to go down, and one of the best ways to accomplish that is to make consumptio­n more expensive. Ideally, we’d see replanning of communitie­s so driving wasn’t so essential, with a focus on energyissu­e mass transit and other options. But before we get there, the average cost of living is likely to go up as the price for pollution increases.

That’s no way to win elections. And when the alternativ­e is an opposition party that views climate change as somewhere between a hoax and an inconvenie­nce, it’s understand­able that Democrats are leery of giving anyone a free campaign issue.

But the alternativ­e can’t be to do nothing. TCI won’t solve all our problems, but it’s a policy that’s on the table and would make some important progress, as well as help make the state more livable. It didn’t get done under the heat of budget negotiatio­ns, but now there’s another chance.

Before the wind blows the wildfire smoke back into Connecticu­t, state leaders need to make it happen.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States