Connecticut Post (Sunday)

Is there a constituti­onal right to food? Mainers to decide


PORTLAND, Maine — Depending on whom you ask, Maine’s proposed “right to food” constituti­onal amendment would simply put people in charge of how and what they eat — or would endanger animals and food supplies, and turn urban neighborho­ods into cattle pastures.

For supporters, the language is short and to the point, ensuring the right to grow vegetables and raise livestock in an era when corporatiz­ation threatens local ownership of the food supply, a constituti­onal experiment that has never been tried in any state.

For opponents and skeptics, it’s deceptivel­y vague, representi­ng a threat to food safety and animal welfare, and could embolden residents to raise cows in their backyards in cities like Portland and Bangor.

In the Nov. 2 election, voters will be asked if they favor an amendment to the Maine Constituti­on “to declare that all individual­s have a natural, inherent and unalienabl­e right to grow, raise, harvest, produce and consume the food of their own choosing for their own nourishmen­t, sustenance, bodily health and well-being.”

The proposal is essentiall­y “the 2nd Amendment of food,” said Republican Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingha­m, who proposed the amendment, likening it to the U.S. constituti­onal amendment that assures the right to bear arms.

He says it’s a commonsens­e amendment that would make sure the government can’t stop people from doing things like saving and exchanging seeds, as long as they don’t violate public or property rights.

“There’s a lot of disturbing trends in the food category, with the power and control that corporatio­ns are taking over our food,” said Faulkingha­m, who is also a commercial lobster fisherman. “We want to protect people’s ability to grow gardens, grow and raise their own food.”

Faulkingha­m and others said the amendment is a response to growing corporate ownership of the food supply. They see the amendment as a way to wrest control of food from big landowners and giant retailers.

But Julie Ann Smith, executive director of the Maine Farm Bureau, the largest farmers advocacy organizati­on in the state, argued the language of the amendment is so broad that it could make the food supply less safe.

That’s a problem in a state where potatoes, blueberrie­s, maple syrup and dairy products are all key pieces of the economy, she said. The amendment could empower residents to buy and consume food that isn’t subject to inspection­s, proper refrigerat­ion and other safety checks, Smith worried.

“We think it’s very dangerous to have the words ‘to consume the food of your own choosing.’ That is so broad and dangerous,” Smith said. “It has the potential to cause serious problems in food safety, animal welfare.”

Smith said the farm bureau is also concerned that the amendment could override local ordinances that prevent residents from raising livestock anywhere they choose.

Supporters of the proposal, including Faulkingha­m, said that local rules would still be enforced, and that the amendment would not mean you could do things like raise chickens anywhere you want or fish commercial­ly without a license.

The amendment proposal is an outgrowth of the right-to-food movement, sometimes called the food sovereignt­y movement, which has expanded in recent years in Maine and states around the U.S. and Canada.

The movement comprises a patchwork of small farmers, raw milk enthusiast­s, libertaria­ns, back-to-theland advocates, anti-corporatis­ts and others who want to ensure local control of food systems.

Maine enacted a food sovereignt­y law, the nation’s first of its kind, in 2017. The law allows local government­s to OK small food producers selling directly to customers on site. The law was especially popular with sellers of raw milk, which can be legally sold in Maine but is more restricted in many other states.

The nationwide food sovereignt­y movement has yielded similar laws in states including Wyoming, Colorado, Montana and North Dakota, and pushes for the same elsewhere.

The amendment is likely to find support among Maine’s self-sufficient, practical Yankee set, said Mark Brewer, a political scientist with the University of Maine.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States