Connecticut Post

Revolution Lighting investigat­es questionab­le accounting

- By Paul Schott

STAMFORD — Revolution Lighting Technologi­es has possibly reported incorrect returns for the past four years, the embattled company revealed in records submitted this week to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The disclosure stems from an investigat­ion assessing the extent to which the firm might have erroneousl­y reported revenues tied to certain transactio­ns. Revolution’s audit committee has not quantified the size of the potential errors, but the company has concluded that it cannot stand behind its quarterly and annual financial statements filed for 2015, 2016 and 2017 and the first half of 2018.

“Until the company has either restated its financial statements for the periods described above or determined that no such restatemen­ts are warranted, investors, analysts and other persons should not rely upon the company’s previously released financial statements for these periods,” Revolution officials wrote in the SEC filing.

The audit committee has so far focused mainly on certain “bill and hold” transactio­ns in 2016, with “apparent errors” identified in financial statements for that year. Inaccurate 2016 data would also affect 2017 records.

In 2017, reported revenues dropped about 12 percent, to around $152 million. The company sustained a loss of $6.7 million for the year.

“The audit committee will continue to assess the accuracy of the company’s previously filed financial statements for the fiscal periods listed above and will assess the impact of the errors on the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting,” the company added in the filing.

Revolution’s filing does not cite any evidence of deliberate­ly falsified records.

The SEC and RSM, the company’s accounting firm, both declined to comment on the case.

Revolution expects “significan­t” expenses related to its review, and any revising, of its financial statements.

“Recognizin­g revenue prematurel­y, particular­ly over numerous years — as appears to be the case here — is generally viewed as a serious accounting error,” said Stephen Ryan, a professor of accounting in New York University’s business school. “This is suggestive

that there were not very good internal controls.”

Ongoing challenges

Revolution’s accounting issues have emerged as CEO and Chairman Robert LaPenta proposes to take private a company that was already struggling with mounting debt and underwhelm­ing earnings.

The company’s debt last month totaled around $65 million, with LaPenta and his “affiliates” having given the firm $7.5 million in related financing between mid-- October and mid-November. In comparison, Revolution’s market value totals about $14 million.

LaPenta has said additional capital requiremen­ts could not be met through third-party financing, but that he and his affiliates would be reluctant to lend more without Revolution changing its operating and cost structure.

“We do not believe that the company is of sufficient scale to justify the costs of remaining a public company and believe that it is

necessary for the company to be a privately held enterprise,” LaPenta wrote in a Nov. 14 letter to the Revolution board’s transactio­n committee.

In addition, pressure to meet quarterly earnings targets has distracted management, preventing full focus on long-term growth and developmen­t, LaPenta has said.

LaPenta has proposed to acquire all of the company’s common stock that he and his affiliates do not own, for $1.50 per share. Company share prices have plunged in recent months, from an annual high of nearly $5 to only about 60 cents.

The board would not decide on LaPenta’s proposal before the transactio­n committee, which comprises independen­t board members, reviewed the plan. A majority of “disinteres­ted” shareholde­rs would also need to approve the privatizat­ion.

In recent years, Revolution has undertaken major projects, including securing a contract to outfit U.S. Navy ships with LED lights.

But the company has grappled with a number of delays, including in its multifamil­y-housing lighting and Greenwich-based TriState LED divisions.

As part of its recent reorganiza­tion, Revolution consolidat­ed two smaller divisions, All Around Lighting and E-Lighting, into the multifamil­y-housing group.

 ?? Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? Robert LaPenta is CEO and chairman of Stamford-based Revolution Lighting Technologi­es.
Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo Robert LaPenta is CEO and chairman of Stamford-based Revolution Lighting Technologi­es.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States