Connecticut Post

Dalio partnershi­p CEO could get $120K severance

- By Keith M. Phaneuf

The embattled CEO of Connecticu­t’s soon-to-bedissolve­d education partnershi­p, Mary Anne Schmitt-Carey, is owed more than $120,000 in severance if terminated — provided she doesn’t publicly criticize the publicpriv­ate initiative, according to contract informatio­n obtained by the CT Mirror.

But hedge fund billionair­e Ray Dalio’s philanthro­pic arm — not the state — would cover any separation costs owed by the Partnershi­p for Connecticu­t. That’s because Dalio Philanthro­pies has agreed to pay all partnershi­p personnel costs, according to Gov. Ned Lamont’s office.

State officials also pledged last week that all financial transactio­ns by the partnershi­p would ultimately be released, closing the book on an experiment that has been marked by controvers­y over transparen­cy since its inception nearly one year ago. Although the Dalios received praise for contributi­ng $100 million over five years — an amount the state pledged to match — to invest in some of Connecticu­t’ lowest-performing schools, the Dalios’ offer came with an unpreceden­ted qualifier: the process would be exempt from state disclosure and ethics rules.

Lamont and Democratic leaders in the General Assembly granted the Dalios’ request when they passed legislatio­n establishi­ng the partnershi­p, but that decision led to persistent criticisms that decisions were being made without full transparen­cy — including those related to the hiring process for its CEO and her ultimate removal.

Following a Freedom of Informatio­n request from the CT Mirror, the Lamont administra­tion last week released the contract sent to Schmitt-Carey, who was hired March 23.

“Although you are an at-will employee, should the Partnershi­p decide to exercise its right to terminate your employment, the Partnershi­p will provide you with a severance payment equal to six (6) months’ salary,” reads the agreement, which set SchmittCar­ey’s annual compensati­on at $247,500.

But while the partnershi­p’s original blueprint called for Connecticu­t and Dalio Philanthro­pies to fund the partnershi­p equally, “it has been the organizati­on’s practice to have all operating expenses be paid for by the Dalios,” said Max Reiss, spokesman for Lamont.

The issue of severance pay and Schmitt-Carey’s future are uncertain for two reasons.

Partnershi­p Chairman Erik Clemons placed her on paid administra­tive leave on May 7, three days, she asserts, after Clemons and Dalio Philanthro­pies’ representa­tives urged her to resign.

Less than two weeks later, on May 19, Lamont announced Ray and Barbara Dalio, who first proposed the joint venture, had grown frustrated about news leaks and decided to dissolve the partnershi­p. The Dalios have pledged to continue funding their end of the project, even though the partnershi­p is over.

CEO compensati­on had been a source of disagreeme­nt

Schmitt-Carey’s compensati­on was a sticking point between the Dalios and the state even before she was hired.

The partnershi­p had budgeted $247,500 for the post. Legislativ­e leaders who serve on the partnershi­p’s Board of Directors said they balked when asked to consider annual compensati­on in excess of $300,000 — more than what most superinten­dents earn — and noted that taxpayer funds would match the couple’s investment dollarfor-dollar.

The partnershi­p ultimately settled on $247,500 and hired Schmitt-Carey, longtime CEO of Say Yes to Education, another nonprofit focused on improving inner city education, lauding her experience in the field.

The honeymoon didn’t last long. Just six weeks into the job, Schmitt-Carey charged that Clemons, Barbara Dalio, and partnershi­p staffer Andrew Ferguson “ambushed” her with “false and defamatory allegation­s” during a May 4 phone call and urged her to resign.

Schmitt-Carey described the meeting in a later email to all partnershi­p board members.

Elected state officials on the partnershi­p’s board said they would not learn of these actions until May 8.

The CT Mirror posed questions to Dalio Philanthro­pies and the partnershi­p through Global Strategy Group, a public relations firm retained by the Dalios. They declined to comment.

Schmitt-Carey also refused to be interviewe­d.

‘Non-disparagem­ent’ agreements raise concerns — in public sector

While Schmitt-Carey’s contract has a severance provision, it also stipulates she “will not at any time make, publish, or communicat­e to any person or entity or in any public forum any defamatory or disparagin­g remarks, comments, or statements concerning the Partnershi­p, or any of its employees, officers, and associated third parties.”

Such “non-disparagem­ent” agreements, though common in the private sector, have increasing­ly come under fire in state government.

The Senate passed a bill in 2015 barring public agencies from reaching deals with managers after the state university system paid departing President Gregory Gray $70,000 through a “non-disparagem­ent” deal. [The bill died in the House.] Gray had faced sharp criticism from faculty and legislator­s.

The state auditors also urged lawmakers to ban the practice altogether after Connecticu­t Lottery Corp CEO Anne Noble stepped down in 2016 following an investigat­ion into gaming fraud.

Despite resigning, Noble was given the post of “senior advisor” and paid $25,000 per month through a non-disparagem­ent deal — an arrangemen­t auditors said allowed her to reach a 10-year employment threshold and qualify for public retirement benefits.

A tumultuous year

When the Dalios, via the Lamont administra­tion, insisted that the partnershi­p be exempt from state disclosure and ethics rules, legislator­s granted the demand over strong objections from House Republican­s.

The Dalios and Lamont defended the exemption by saying the problems facing Connecticu­t’s school systems couldn’t be solved without difficult, sensitive conversati­ons that would never occur if they were subjected to public scrutiny. Board decisions and finances, they said, still would be explained afterward and made public through website reports and community briefings.

Critics, like Gwen Samuel of Meriden, president of the Connecticu­t Parents Union, said the approach was counter-intuitive, limiting access to families most concerned about improving public schools.

“If we’re talking about parents taking responsibi­lity for their children, if we’re talking about parents being engaged, then this approach was contradict­ory to all of the efforts of our public school system,” she said. “You don’t meet privately and tell us what you did afterward. You have to include us. There is no way around that.”

But the Dalios also sought to vet and approve legislativ­e leaders’ appointmen­ts to the partnershi­p board. Democrats and Republican­s balked at this, and a compromise was reached for top lawmakers to serve themselves on the panel.

Then, when Attorney General William Tong concluded elected state officials on the board would have to disclose partnershi­p documents in accordance with FOI rules, Dalio representa­tives proposed empowering a subcommitt­ee of the board —one that included no elected officials — to make most major decisions.

“It has become clear that it’s not working because of political fighting,” Barbara Dalio wrote in a statement on May 19. “I am not a politician and I never signed up to become one. I only want to help people. Through this experience I’ve learned about our broken political system and I don’t see a path through it to help people.” She added that even without the partnershi­p the Dalios still would invest $100 million in public schools in poor communitie­s.

When the partnershi­p ultimately broke down, the Dalios blamed House Republican­s — particular­ly Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby — and the news media.

But Connecticu­t’s partnershi­p with the Dalios — who have won praise from education leaders for previous initiative­s to assist atrisk students in several communitie­s — was different from state initiative­s from the start.

In a May 23 post on Twitter, Ray Dalio never named Klarides but effectivel­y identified her, charging her with playing partisan politics and leaking “distorted stories to some media folks who wanted to write sensationa­listic stories.”

But Klarides wasn’t the only critic, even among legislator­s.

Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, said the proposal to empower an executive subcommitt­ee to run the partnershi­p would have reduced the role of legislator­s to “window dressing.”

And after the partnershi­p collapsed, two Democratic leaders — Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney and House Majority Leader Matt Ritter — both said the basic approach, in hindsight, was flawed.

Lamont, at the end, was frustrated that SchmittCar­ey’s personnel issue had made news reports, and expressed surprise the offer to provide limited access to the process, through reports, briefings and press conference­s, hadn’t assuaged critics.

“We worked through this, I thought,” he said. “We were going to earn the trust of the people of Connecticu­t.”

The governor and the four legislativ­e leaders on the board have declined to discuss specifics of the CEO matter, noting that personnel issues among public school employees normally are exempt from disclosure under FOI law.

But Lamont and all four legislativ­e leaders on the board — Looney, Fasano, Klarides and House Speaker Joe Aresimowic­z — all asserted last week that the partnershi­p’s fiscal records still would remain public.

As researcher­s, when running new clinical trials, we never know what to expect.

Most of the time they are complete failures, forcing us back to the drawing board. But in very rare cases, results far exceed our expectatio­ns and these product work better than we could have ever imagined.

This is the case with the most recent breakthrou­gh in Urology called Urivarx, a new bladder control pill which has performed extraordin­ary in every test.

From dramatic reductions in urgency and frequency… dribbling and leaking… nighttime bathroom trips… and even diaper use…the improvemen­ts men and women are seeing with this nonprescri­ption pill have been phenomenal.

So phenomenal, in fact, it’s been rumored that the new capsule may soon replace diapers in pharmacies across the country.

Why so effective? asked its developers same question.

We that

STRENGTHEN­S THE BLADDER MUSCLES & PREVENTS THEM FROM RELEASING

Until now, many within the medical community − including myself − believed it was impossible to strengthen the muscles that control the bladder without drugs, surgery, or exercises.

Remarkably, it has now been proven this can be achieved with a tiny a pill. Albeit, a natural one.

The secret? A revolution­ary discovery that helps the bladder create a tighter seal...while also preventing your bladder from releasing involuntar­ily.

Research shows that as we age, the muscles surroundin­g the bladder can deteriorat­e. This is triggered by hormonal changes in the body which results in muscle atrophy, the medical term for muscle shrinking.

When these muscles get too small and weak, they cannot seal the bladder shut. That’s why you may leak, dribble, and experience uncontroll­able accidents.

Worse, because the bladder fails to empty completely, you feel like you need to go all the time! And as old urine just sits there, it can seep into your blood stream, causing painful infections which need multiple rounds of antibiotic­s to get rid of.

“URIVARX TARGETS A FAILING BLADDER IN A WHOLE NEW WAY”

In its most recent clinical trial, scientists discovered a trio of science based compounds that actually strengthen the tiny muscles surroundin­g the bladder. So effectivel­y that they were shown to decrease adult diaper use by a staggering 400%.

Even more surprising, these three compounds also had a rejuvenati­ng effect on the bladder, allowing it to work like it was years younger.

The result? All the worries you have about your overactive bladder can finally be put to rest! And you can enjoy a new level of comfort of confidence that you once had before. And it starts happening in minutes.

IMPRESSIVE CLINICAL RESULTS

The exciting clinical results published on the government clinical website clinicaltr­ials.gov show that UriVarx™ can strengthen your bladder fast, significan­tly reducing the urine urgency and leaks.

In a new double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study, 142 men and women with bladder control issues were separated into two groups. The first group was given a placebo while the other received UriVarx™.

The results incredible.

were

The participan­ts who received UriVarx™ saw major improvemen­ts in leaking, pressure, and the urgency to go − all without the usual side effects seen in prescripti­on drugs! They also reported fewer trips to the bathroom both day and night.

Additional­ly, at the end of clinical trial and after seeing the results, 84% of the participan­ts taking UriVarx™ said it significan­tly improved their quality of life.

“The clinical findings are incredible, but people still wonder if it will really work” explains lead developer for Urivarx. “It’s normal to be skeptical, but we’ve seen thousands of UriVarx™ users get results exactly like the participan­ts in the study. It’s an amazing product.”

EXCITING RESULTS FROM URIVARX USERS

Many UriVarx™ users say their bladders have never been stronger. For the first time in years, they are confident and in complete control. Adult pads and diapers are no longer a big worry.

“It’s exciting to hear all of the positive feedback” explains a spokespers­on for the company.

“Its also helps to gain perspectiv­e. These people will share how embarrasse­d they’ve become over the situation. How uncomforta­ble it makes social outings and the interrupti­ons it causes in daily life.

They can’t believe the change Urivarx has made. The fear is gone. They are back to feeling in control”

HOW IT WORKS

UriVarx™ is a pill that’s taken just once daily. It does not require a prescripti­on.

The active ingredient­s are patented natural extracts.

Research shows that as we get older, the muscles which surround the bladder weaken. This is caused by hormonal changes in the body that causes the muscles to atrophy and weaken.

When they become too small and weak, they cannot seal your bladder shut, which causes leaking, accidents, among other incontinen­ce symptoms.

It also prevents your bladder from fully emptying, which can result in persistent bacterial infections and UTIs.

UriVarx’s™ active ingredient targets the muscles around the bladder, making them stronger. Supporting ingredient­s in UriVarx™ support kidney function and overall urinary health.

BLADDER PROBLEMS GONE

With daily use, UriVarx™ can restore strong bladder control and help users overcome leakage without the negative side effects or interactio­ns associated with drugs.

Leakage sufferers can now put an end to the uncontroll­able urges, the embarrassi­ng accidents, and enjoy an entirely new level of comfort and confidence.

HOW TO GET URIVARX IN CONNECTICU­T

This is the official release of UriVarx™ in Connecticu­t. As such, the company is offering a special discounted supply to anyone suffering from bladder issues who calls within the next 48 hours.

A special hotline number and discounted pricing has been created for all Connecticu­t residents. Discounts will be available starting today at 6:00AM and will automatica­lly be applied to all callers.

Your Toll-Free Hotline number is 1-800-310-8689 and will only be open for the next 48 hours. Only a limited discounted supply of UriVarx™ is currently available in your region.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States