Connecticut Post

Police need to be transparen­t

- By Mike Savino Mike Savino is president of the Connecticu­t Council on Freedom of Informatio­n. He is also a reporter for WFSB.

George Floyd’s death at the hands, or rather knee, of a Minnesota police demonstrat­es the difficulty in holding law enforcemen­t accountabl­e.

Before this latest incident, the officer, Derek Chauvin, faced at least 17 misconduct complaints with the Minneapoli­s Police Department.

But accountabi­lity is nearly impossible without transparen­cy, and too often police are able to block public access to informatio­n.

Many local department­s here in Connecticu­t still don’t have body cameras for officers, despite the state offering financial help through grants.

And many still don’t post on their website instructio­ns for how the public can file complaints, even though the Legislatur­e mandated this be done years ago.

Some department­s drag out requests for records, even denying requests for reasons that are obvious violations of the state Freedom of Informatio­n Act.

A state law passed in 2015 makes it clear that arrest records are public even when the defendant’s case is ongoing, but many department­s still wrongly claim the “pending prosecutio­n” exemption.

The worst violator is the Connecticu­t State Police, whose affronts to transparen­cy are too numerous to mention.

But the lowlights include a case last year when state police told a newspaper that dashboard camera footage of a particular incident didn’t exist. As if by a miracle, they discovered the video did in fact exist, and just in time for a FOI hearing.

During that hearing, it was found state police have violated the FOI Act at least 26 times in the last decade. That’s just the result of complaints actually filed.

This unimpressi­ve track record earned the state police the Society of Profession­al Journalist­s’ Black Hole Award in March, recognizin­g the agency as the least transparen­t in the country.

And the hits keep coming. The state police union contract that recently took effect limits public access to internal affairs reports and other records.

But now the state police are interpreti­ng a protection for personal informatio­n — things like medical records — to cover the entire personnel file, a series of records that details a trooper’s work history.

This is something the Legislatur­e and Gov. Ned Lamont need to change during the upcoming special session.

Protests have once again laid bare the vital need to address police brutality and accountabi­lity. That can only be accomplish­ed with more transparen­cy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States