Connecticut Post

CT essential workers could see $233 bonuses, not $1,000

- By Keith M. Phaneuf

Nursing home staff, grocery store workers and others who kept essential services running during the pandemic would receive bonuses of about $233 each — not even one-quarter of the $1,000 state officials dangled before them — based on new calculatio­ns released Wednesday by state Comptrolle­r-elect Sean Scanlon and by Comptrolle­r Natalie Braswell.

Scanlon also renewed his call to provide the full bonuses, reporting it would cost at least an extra $99 million to keep what effectivel­y amounted to a promise to remember and reward privatesec­tor workers who risked their lives when the coronaviru­s struck in 2020.

“I think it’s been obvious to everyone for months that there was not enough money and that there was more interest in the program than everyone anticipate­d,” said Scanlon, a state representa­tive who was elected earlier this month to his first term as comptrolle­r — and who will have to administer the Premium Pay program after he takes office on Jan. 4. He made his announceme­nt at Hartford Hospital, where many health care workers sought pandemic bonuses.

“The comptrolle­r’s office is in the untenable position of having to pro-rate a check to somebody who literally risked their life for our state,” Scanlon said, adding it all would be done “for an amount of money that I personally find to be unacceptab­le.”

More than 248,000 workers submitted applicatio­ns, though only about 207,000 were completed. Out of those, 134,010 were approved, according to the comptrolle­r’s office.

More than eight out of 10 approved applicatio­ns, 108,838 in total, came from workers who earned less than $100,000 annually — and therefore were supposed to receive the maximum grant of $1,000.

About 12,500 more came from individual­s who earned between $100,000 and $150,000. They were eligible for grants ranging from $800 to $200, but — unless more resources are added to the program — will be pro-rated downward to as little as $46.

Close to 12,000 part-timers applied for a grant of $500. That would be reduced to $116.

Payments are supposed to be issued in January.

“Since this program launched, my staff and I have heard from countless essential workers who are in need of financial support,” said Braswell, who has been comptrolle­r for the past year since her predecesso­r, Democrat Kevin P. Lembo, retired for health reasons. “The initial approval numbers show the scale of that need, with tens of thousands of front-line workers meeting the criteria for assistance. I encourage lawmakers to explore all opportunit­ies to expand funding for the program and deliver as much help as possible to those who sacrificed on our behalf during the pandemic.”

Even as Gov. Ned Lamont and the General Assembly approved the program in May, labor advocates warned the $30 million budget they assigned to it was woefully inadequate.

Up to 5% of the $30 million program budget was earmarked for marketing and administra­tive costs, leaving $28.5 million for grants. By simple math, the program could not deliver more than 28,500 grants of $1,000 each.

The legislatur­e’s Labor Committee had recommende­d a $750 million program that was expected to provide hundreds of thousands of public- and privatesec­tor workers with grants up to $2,000 per person. But that idea lacked support from Lamont and from the full legislatur­e.

Unionized state employees are taking the Lamont administra­tion to arbitratio­n on Dec. 16 to argue for special pandemic bonuses.

Labor leaders here also pointed to neighborin­g Massachuse­tts, which budgeted $500 million for pandemic bonuses. The Bay State had sent $500 payments to 480,000 people in March and another 330,000 in May, according to the commonweal­th’s Executive Office of Administra­tion and Finance.

To make the dollars stretch, the Lamont administra­tion and lawmakers stipulated that all bonuses would be reduced proportion­ally if demand exceeded supply.

Republican legislator­s said the obvious lack of funding for Connecticu­t’s program showed it was little more than a state election year stunt. It was designed, they said, to grab summer and fall headlines for Lamont and his fellow Democrats at the polls but then never to deliver on the full advertised grants. Lamont was reelected to a second term earlier this month while Democrats maintained large majorities in the House and Senate.

Still, Democratic legislativ­e leaders said earlier this fall they were planning to come into special session in December to add some funding, though they didn’t commit to providing enough to avoid pro-rating grants.

Lamont has said only that he would review any proposals for additional funding from legislator­s.

Some Democrats including Rep. Robyn Porter of New Haven and Sen. Julia Kushner of Danbury — who co-chair the Labor Committee — have said Connecticu­t must provide the full grants offered to essential workers. Porter had predicted earlier in the fall that, absent more state funding, prorated grants might not be enough to cover one week’s worth of groceries.

According to the U.S. Department of Agricultur­e’s estimates for weekly food costs for a family of four — with two adults and two elementary-school aged children — a “moderate” grocery bill averaged, nationally, $252.90 in September.

The Connecticu­t AFL-CIO’s president, Ed Hawthorne, also has said it would be a blow to labor morale if the state didn’t deliver the full bonuses.

Scanlon did not say Wednesday where he would draw funds to recapitali­ze the Premium Pay program budget.

But labor leaders have said the $100 million price tag is something the state easily can afford simply by opening its swollen coffers.

Connecticu­t has a record-setting $3.3 billion in its rainy day fund, and the surplus projected for the current fiscal year is expected to approach $2.8 billion based on a new report upgrading revenue estimates.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States