Cruising World

Editor’s Log

- BY MARK PILLSBURY

Score one for the water tribe in Georgia—all the sailors, powerboate­rs, anglers and other aqua lovers—who deserve a big, collective high five from the rest of us for banding together to push for a rollback of some of the most draconian anchoring restrictio­ns in the country. Over the course of the past year, they have talked. They have lobbied. They have remained calm and reasonable. And most recently, it appears that took a significan­t step forward, when the Georgia House of Representa­tives approved legislatio­n, called HB 833, that will overwrite and reverse rules announced in January that make it nearly impossible to anchor in many areas along the Georgia coast, including some 140 miles of the Intracoast­al Waterway.

I say that it looks to be a step forward, because after being overwhelmi­ngly approved by the House, the legislatio­n still needs to be passed by the Senate, and that action has been put on hold— as has nearly everything—by the unfolding coronaviru­s crisis. Still, the group Save Georgia’s Anchorages is hopeful it will eventually pass.

In the meantime, according to one account on Facebook, while the current anchoring restrictio­ns remain in place, the good news is that it doesn’t appear they are being vigorously enforced. It comes at a time when the northbound migration of winter cruisers is about to start.

To be fair, Georgia is not the only coastal state to grapple with water-quality issues, abandoned derelict vessels, access to the sea or landowners’ rights. Battles with the boating community in neighborin­g Florida are well-documented; as far away as New England, there are harbors where anchoring has all but been eliminated, thanks to the proliferat­ion of mooring fields.

But, in Georgia, critics say, officials decided to correct a problem that doesn’t exist, and did so in a way that severely affects how people can use their boats, even if the overwhelmi­ng majority of them plan to do so in a responsibl­e way. Making matters more objectiona­ble, the law reportedly was drafted with zero input from the boating community, and then as regulation­s were being drawn up by the state’s Department of Natural Resources and public hearings were held, concerns raised by a number of marine organizati­ons were flat-out ignored.

The result: No anchoring anywhere in the state within 300 yards of a marina or 1,000 yards of a structure; the enactment of anchoring permits and fees; strict rules on waste discharge, including a requiremen­t to keep logs of pump-out visits; and onerous fines for any violations.

As one critic wrote in a January report in the Waterway

Guide, a publicatio­n that has covered this ongoing saga from the outset, the anchoring bill was “never about concern over the cleanlines­s of Georgia’s waters. It was about getting rid of a couple of nuisance boats in the coastal Georgia area to make a couple of powerful people happy. It was their scenery that was getting polluted—not the water.”

When word of the anchoring law began to spread this past May, boating groups banded together. A pertinent question: If this happens now in Georgia, where next? Besides the Waterway Guide, the alliance included the National Marine Manufactur­ers Associatio­n, America’s Great Loop Cruisers’ Associatio­n, the Marine Trawlers Owners Associatio­n, the Seven Seas Cruising Associatio­n, Boatu.s., and a host of other groups and individual­s.

When their concerns fell on deaf ears, and Georgia’s DNR released its restrictio­ns in January, rather than give up, the boating community continued its efforts and even engaged lobbyists to help educate lawmakers. At stake, besides residents’ rights to use their boats and the rights of the many vessels that transit the ICW, was the value of the boating community to businesses all along Georgia’s coast. In the end, good sense prevailed—in the House at least. With luck, it will in the Senate too. Reports indicate the new rules—if and when adopted— will be easy to abide by.

And perhaps, there’s a lesson to be learned here. As other states try to enact fees, restrict water access and limit our ability to stop where we want for the night, let’s see if we can’t stick together and turn the tide back in our favor.

 ??  ?? Overly stringent regulation­s have put many of Georgia’s anchorages along the ICW off limits for dropping the hook.
Overly stringent regulation­s have put many of Georgia’s anchorages along the ICW off limits for dropping the hook.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States