Daily Camera (Boulder)

Half its original size, Biden’s plan in race to finish

- By Lisa Mascaro, Aamer Madhani and Alan Fram

WASHINGTON — Half its original size, President Joe Biden’s big domestic policy plan is being pulled apart and reconfigur­ed as Democrats edge closer to satisfying their most reluctant colleagues and finishing what’s now about a $1.75 trillion package.

How to pay for it all remained deeply in flux Tuesday, with a proposed billionair­es’ tax running into criticism as cumbersome or worse. That’s forcing difficult reductions, if not the outright eliminatio­n, of policy priorities — from paid family leave to child care to dental, vision and hearing aid benefits for seniors.

The once hefty climate change strategies are losing some punch, too, focusing away from punitive measures on polluters in a shift toward instead rewarding clean energy incentives.

All told, Biden’s package remains a substantia­l undertakin­g -- and could still top $2 trillion in perhaps the largest effort of its kind from Congress in decades. But it’s far slimmer than the president and his party first envisioned.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told lawmakers in a caucus meeting they were on the verge of “something major, transforma­tive, historic and bigger than anything else” ever attempted in Congress, according to a person who requested anonymity to share her private remarks.

“We know that we are close,” said Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-ohio, the chair of the Congressio­nal Black Caucus, after a meeting with Biden at the White House. “And let me be explicitly clear: Our footprints and fingerprin­ts are on this.”

However, vast difference­s among Democrats remain over basic contours of the sweeping proposal and the tax revenue to pay for it. As Biden pushes for an agreement before he departs for global summits later this week, pressure is mounting on holdout Democrats — Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.

From the White House, Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Biden still hoped to have a deal in hand to show foreign leaders the U.S. government was performing effectivel­y on climate change and other major issues. But she acknowledg­ed that might not hap

pen, forcing him to keep working on the package from afar.

She warned about failure as opposed to compromise

“The alternativ­e to what is being negotiated is not the original package,” she said. “It is nothing.”

More lawmakers journeyed to the White House for negotiatio­ns on Tuesday and emerged upbeat that the end product would be substantia­l, despite the changes and reductions being forced on them by Manchin and Sinema.

Together the two senators have packed a one-two punch — Manchin forcing supporters to pare back health care, child care and other spending and Sinema caus

ing Democrats to reconsider their plans to reverse the Trump-era tax cuts on corporatio­ns and the wealthy.

Resolving the revenue side is key as Biden insists all the new spending will be fully paid for and not piled onto the national debt. He vows any new taxes will hit only the wealthy, those earning more than $400,000 a year, or $450,000 for couples, and corporatio­ns he says must quit skipping out on taxes and start paying their “fair share.”

But the White House had to rethink its tax strategy after Sinema objected to her party’s initial proposal to raise tax rates on corporatio­ns and the wealthy, With a 50-50 Senate, Biden has no votes to spare in his party.

Instead, to win over Sinema and others, the Democrats were poised to unveil a new plan for taxing the assets of billionair­es. And on Tuesday they unveiled a proposal to require corporatio­ns with more than $1 billion in income to pay a 15% minimum tax, winning Sinema’s backing.

“Here’s the heart of it: Americans read over the last few months that billionair­es were paying little or no taxes for years on end,” said Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, helming the effort.

Under Wyden’s emerging plan, the billionair­es’ tax would hit the wealthiest of Americans, fewer than 1,000 people. It would require those with assets of more than $1 billion, or three-years consecutiv­e income of $100 million, to pay taxes on the gains of stocks and other tradeable assets, rather than waiting until holdings are sold.

A similar billionair­e’s tax would be applied to non-tradeable assets, including real estate, but it would be deferred with the tax not assessed until the asset was sold.

Overall, the billionair­es’ tax rate had not been set, but it was expected to be at least the 20% capital gains rate. Democrats have said it could raise $200 billion in revenue that could help fund Biden’s package over 10 years.

Republican­s deride the billionair­es’ tax and some have suggested it would face a legal challenge.

And key fellow Democrats were also raising concerns about the billionair­es’ tax, saying the idea of simply undoing the 2017 tax cuts by hiking top rates was more straightfo­rward and transparen­t.

 ?? Samuel Corum / Getty Images ?? Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., is surrounded by reporters as she heads to the floor of the Senate following the Democrats Policy Luncheon at the U.S. Capitol building on Tuesday in Washington, D.C. Democrats continue to negotiate within their party as they try to get the major parts of President Joe Biden's legislativ­e agenda through Congress.
Samuel Corum / Getty Images Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., is surrounded by reporters as she heads to the floor of the Senate following the Democrats Policy Luncheon at the U.S. Capitol building on Tuesday in Washington, D.C. Democrats continue to negotiate within their party as they try to get the major parts of President Joe Biden's legislativ­e agenda through Congress.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States