Law partner talks crime scene problems, thefts
A former law partner of Alex Murdaugh testified at his double murder trial Wednesday that more than a dozen people walked around the scene of the killings of Murdaugh’s wife and son before South Carolina law enforcement and first responders arrived.
Once state agents arrived, Murdaugh, his law partners and friends were sent to the sprawling property’s home, which authorities hadn’t entered since Murdaugh called 911 to say his wife and son were shot.
“This is a pretty big farm and I don’t know who is over there. Two people have been gunned down,” attorney Mark Ball recounted in testimony. “Safety is one concern. And is that house part of what has gone on here? Where does the crime scene start and stop?”
While the defense had Ball highlight what he saw as problems at the crime scene and Murdaugh’s devotion to family, prosecutors on cross examination used Ball to walk through Murdaugh’s apparent lies to police.
Those allegedly include where he was just before the killings, his lack of concern for his own safety or that of his son after the shootings and the theft of millions of dollars from the family law firm.
Murdaugh, 54, is standing trial in the deaths of his wife Maggie, 52, who was felled by four or five rifle shots, and their 22-year-old son Paul, who died from two shotgun blasts. Both were killed near kennels on the rural Colleton County property on June 7, 2021. Murdaugh faces 30 years to life in prison if convicted.
Alex Murdaugh may testify. Defense attorney Jim Griffin asked the judge Wednesday if he would allow Murdaugh to take his Fifth Amendment right against incriminating himself in the 100 or so other allegations he faces — including stealing from clients, money laundering, tax evasion and insurance fraud. The defense said he could testify as early as Thursday if he chooses to do so.
Judge Clifton Newman said prosecutors generally get wide latitude in cross examination.
The judge agreed with prosecutors to allow evidence of other alleged crimes to show Murdaugh killed his family to gain sympathy and buy time to hide his financial misdeeds. Prosecutors also want to show Murdaugh lied to police about his own subsequent shooting months afterward.
He initially said he was shot by a stranger, but later said he asked a friend to shoot him so Murdaugh’s surviving son could collect $12 million in life insurance.
Ball, who arrived at the farm about 45 minutes after Murdaugh called 911, was a compelling witness for both sides Wednesday. He described a chaotic crime scene.
Police hadn’t blocked the entrance to the property and more than a dozen people not with law enforcement were walking around shell casings and pools of blood near the shooting site. A light rain was intermittently falling and the runoff from a roof was hitting Paul Murdaugh’s body.
“It’s a crime scene. You don’t want water dripping all over the place but more importantly, I thought it was pretty disrespectful. Paul was a good young man and quite frankly it just pissed me off,” Ball testified.
Ball returned the day after the shootings once state agents said they were finished investigating the scene and found uncollected shotgun pellets, small clumps of tissue and a large fragment of Paul Murdaugh’s skull.
“It infuriated me,” Ball said. “It was kind of like walking across a grave.”
The defense called a crime scene reconstruction expert who said the police might have lost evidence.
Kenneth Zercie testified if the bodies had to be covered, police should have used a tarp instead of a sheet that can absorb fluids. Zercie said agents made it worse by not holding onto the sheet and losing potential evidence such as hair or DNA — from a possible killer.