Newsom urges approval of desalination project
Final vote on $1.4 billion Orange County plant could influence other desalination projects statewide
Citing California’s worsening drought conditions, Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday urged the California Coastal Commission to give final approval for construction of a new $1.4 billion desalination plant on the state’s coastline.
The proposed oceanfront facility in Huntington Beach has been under debate for more than 20 years, and its outcome could set a course for other desalination plants on the state’s coast.
“We need more tools in the damn tool kit,” Newsom said during a meeting with the Bay Area News Group editorial board when asked about the project. “We are as dumb as we want to be. What more evidence do you need that you need to have more tools in the tool kit than what we’ve experienced? Seven out of the last 10 years have been severe drought.”
On Monday the staff of the Coastal Commission recommended that the project be denied, citing its impact on marine life, energy use, its vulnerability to sea level rise, and the potential to drive up water rates for low-income residents. It’s up for a vote in two weeks.
Newsom said a no vote by the full commission to kill the project would be “a big mistake, a big setback.”
If approved at the May 12 Coastal Commission meeting, the project would be the second major ocean desalination plant built in California, following the opening in 2015 of a $1 billion plant in San Diego County by Poseidon Water, the same company that wants to build the Huntington Beach plant.
Some environmental groups fought both, saying they use too much energy, harm marine life and provide the most expensive type of drinking water.
“It’s disappointing that the governor doesn’t seem to be interested in the scale and nuance that’s needed to understand the impacts of this plant,” said Mandy Sackett, California policy coordinator of the Surfrider Foundation. “It would be a step backwards in terms of solving our state’s water needs.”
Orange County has ample groundwater, Sackett said. And other water sources, such as expanding recycled water, stormwater capture and more conservation, including programs that pay people to remove lawns, provide water that is cheaper than ocean desalination, she added.
The project would be located on 12 acres of a 54acre site also occupied by the AES Huntington Beach Energy Center, a natural gas-fired power plant.
It would draw in up to 106 million gallons of seawater per day to produce up to 50 million gallons a day of potable water — enough for 400,000 people — for purchase by local water districts. Poseidon’s desalination plant in Carlsbad, the largest in North America, produces roughly the same amount of water, providing about 10% of San Diego’s annual water supply.
The plant would discharge 57 million gallons a day of highly saline brine through the power plant’s existing outfall pipe, which extends offshore about 1,500 feet. The project also would involve demolition of old oil storage tanks formerly used by the power plant.
State scientists say the project would kill fish larvae, plankton and other marine life. The intake pipe would have screens with 1 millimeter mesh to prevent larger fish and other animals from being drawn into the pipe. The project also would use significant amounts of electricity.
Newsom said Thursday he believes the environmental concerns can be addressed by requiring the company to make various offsets including restoring wetlands and other efforts, and perhaps by having those rules toughened.
“In the staff report,” Newsom added, “which I had a chance to peruse — I didn’t go into all of the specifics, it’s a long report — but I appreciate they made a few recommendations that the Coastal Commission can pick up on. That’s related to offsets and mitigation on wetlands and other things that Poseidon would be required to do. Those are longer term. Perhaps they can move those sooner.”
The Coastal Commission is one of California’s more powerful government agencies. It has 12 members, four of whom are appointed by the governor, and eight of whom are appointed by the leader of the state Senate and Assembly.
Asked if he has personally spoken with commissioners since the staff report came out recommending the project be denied, Newsom said he had not. He noted that he has supported the project publicly for nine years. Other supporters include Sen. Dianne Feinstein, former Gov. Jerry Brown and Huntington Beach Mayor Barbara Delgleize.
“I’ve been encouraging this project for some time,” Newsom said. “And I’m also encouraging accountability, and I’m encouraging making sure they do mitigation. And to the extent they want to strengthen all that, bring it on. Keep an eye on the environmental justice issues and costs. Be tough. Be fair though. Don’t be ideological.”
Late Friday, a spokeswoman for Poseidon Water said she welcomed Newsom’s remarks.
“This project is the most studied project in the state,” said Jessica Jones, a Poseidon spokeswoman. “If the California Coastal Commission denies it, there is not a clear path forward for any desalination project in the state.”
She said the water is drought-proof because it does not rely on Sierra snow or rainfall.
Asked about the high cost to produce the water, Jones said that water from the Carlsbad plant currently costs $2,700 an acre foot, which amounts to $5 to $7 per month per household. That cost is two to three times the rate that cities in Southern California and Santa Clara County pay for other sources of treated water from large wholesale suppliers.
Jones said she expects similar costs for water from the Huntington Beach plant, although that will depend on how much environmental restoration, such as restoring wetlands at nearby Bolsa Chica, that the company is required to do to obtain the final permit.
Newsom also said Friday that he plans to devote more money to water storage projects in his “May revise” budget due out in two weeks. He said he does not plan to use general fund money to pay all the costs of a huge new project, like the proposed Sites Reservoir in Colusa County,but beyond that did not offer details.