Why voters should oppose constitutional convention

Dear Editor: This November voters will be asked to vote on whether to hold a state constitutional convention. The last convention was held in 1967. It was widely considered wasteful and harmful and its proposals were rejected. Why vote “No?” It’s supported by the Koch brothers and the Mercers.

Opposition comes from Left, Center, and Right, including AFL-CIO; NYSUT; environmental groups; State Rifle and Pistol Association; Republican Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan; Democratic Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie; and Independent Democratic Conference (conservative senate Democrats).

Planned Parenthood and Right to Life have joined forces in opposition, as have the Working Families Party and the Conservative Party of NY.

The Rockefeller Institute states that “the risks outweigh the rewards.”

A convention is not the only way to alter the state Constitution. Lawmakers may propose constitutional amendments which, if passed, will be sent to voters for ratification.

A constitutional convention is unlimited in what it can change. Among rights and protections thought to be in danger of alteration or elimination are guaranteed free public education and the right to workers compensation. The right to unionize and requirements regarding pensions could be undermined. Public employee pensions are currently protected from being “diminished or impaired.” In addition, the Constitution says the Tax-Deferred Annuity Program must guarantee a fixed rate of return — a critical means of retirement security along with Social Security, a defined-benefit pension and health insurance. These protections could be eliminated if a convention opens up the constitution for revision.

The New York State League of Women Voters says a convention may cost $300 million.

Mitch Newman

Rifton, N.Y.