Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

IN THE SPOTLIGHT

- Photos and text from wire services

Timberlake at Super Bowl: White male privilege again?

NEW YORK » The booking of Justin Timberlake for the Super Bowl halftime show has triggered a backlash from women, minorities and others who say Janet Jackson was unfairly forced to pay a far higher price than he ever faced for that breast-baring “wardrobe malfunctio­n” at the big game in 2004.

The hashtag #justicefor­janet trended on social media this week after the NFL announced Timberlake would perform Feb. 4 in Minneapoli­s.

Some argued that Jackson fell victim to a sexist and racist double standard and received harsher treatment over a decade ago than Timberlake did, while he benefited from “white male privilege.”

“His body was not criminaliz­ed and demonized in the way that hers was, and that has everything to do with being a white man,” said Janell Hobson, an associate professor of women’s, gender and sexuality studies at the State University of New York at Albany.

Representa­tives for Timberlake and Jackson did not respond to emails seeking comment.

The NFL said no one has been banned from the halftime show — indirectly referring to Jackson — but didn’t elaborate on the decision to invite Timberlake back or comment on Jackson specifical­ly.

Thirteen years ago, as Timberlake sang the lyrics “Bet I have you naked at the end of this song,” he ripped Jackson’s costume to reveal her right breast, bare except for a nipple ring. Jackson later said her lace undergarme­nt was supposed to remain intact but accidental­ly pulled away.

She was barred a week later from the Grammy telecast, where she had been scheduled to perform, and her star power diminished, though she eventually rebounded. He 2015 album debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard charts, and she is now on a top-selling tour.

This will be Timberlake’s third time at the halftime show, the most for any performer ever. He first performed there in 2001 with his boy band NSYNC, then went on to appear as Jackson’s guest.

Timberlake has apologized more than once over the years.

When asked about the wardrobe malfunctio­n in an interview this week, Timberlake said, “That won’t happen this time.”

Social media erupted when the Super Bowl announceme­nt was made, especially Black Twitter.

“I feel that considerin­g the damage that that moment did to her career unfairly, I would like to see Justin never return to the Super Bowl,” said Jamilah Lemieux, vice president of news and men’s programmin­g at digital publishing company iOne Digital and black culture website CASSIUS.

“It didn’t slow him down. She wasn’t allowed to go the Grammys. How do you have the Grammys without Janet Jackson?” Lemieux asked. “She’s faced more punishment for her breast being revealed than people who have been accused of sexual assault.”

Hobson, author of 2012’s “Body as Evidence: Mediating Race, Globalizin­g Gender,” said it is interestin­g that news of Timberlake’s return comes at a time when pop culture is dominated by headlines about misconduct by such figures as Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby and Bill O’Reilly.

 ?? DAVID PHILLIP — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE ?? In this file photo, singers Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson are seen during their performanc­e at Super Bowl XXXVIII in Houston.
DAVID PHILLIP — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE In this file photo, singers Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson are seen during their performanc­e at Super Bowl XXXVIII in Houston.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States